A SECRET list of donors to the anti-independence group Scotland in Union has been inadvertently released by the Electoral Commission.
The elections watchdog failed to redact the material properly when it included it in a freedom of information release published on its website earlier this month.
A simple “cut and paste” procedure was enough to reveal the names of scores of donors, what they gave and when.
Much of the same material was released in a Scotland in Union (SIU) security breach at the New Year, when a donor spreadsheet was sent to Nationalist websites and SIU alerted the police and the Information Commissioner.
The Electoral Commission published the FoI release on April 17.
It is not known how many people downloaded it or spotted the security flaw.
News of the blunder coincided with a report that SIU, which opposes another referendum, met controversial data firm Cambridge Analytica (CA) last year.
The Open Democracy website reported SIU founder and deputy chair Will Ramsay boasted of a contact to a fundraising dinner in London in November.
Mr Ramsay was quoted saying: “The SNP have an army of supporters, and a sophisticated database - I know that from speaking to Cambridge Analytica the other day, who are not working for them, thank goodness.”
The SNP has recently been under fire over its contact with CA in February 2016, when an “external consultant” met the firm.
CA has since been linked to a privacy breach affecting up to 87m Facebook users.
The Electoral Commission last night removed the faulty document from its website.
A spokesman said there had been a “technical issue” with redactions which enabled access to personal information, adding: “We regret this error, are investigating as a matter of urgency and will provide further information at the earliest opportunity.”
SIU were approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel