By Andrew Griffiths
When many people think of harmful activity by a foreign power against the UK, their minds are naturally drawn to the abhorrent use of a chemical weapon on the streets of Salisbury. We have always been clear in our assessment that it is highly likely that the Russian state is responsible.
This outrageous attempt to kill the Skripals on British streets was a highly visible example of harm directed against our country. But every year, largely unseen, foreign actors including from Russia are undermining our economy by abusing our business entities to launder dirty money through the UK.
READ MORE: Law firm axes SLP mailbox service
This Government will always take strong action to protect its citizens and our interests. Following the events in Salisbury, it set out one of the toughest package of measures against another state in three decades. From strengthening our powers to impose sanctions in response to the violation of human rights to considering new counter-espionage powers to harden the UK’s defences against hostile state activity: it is deploying the full spectrum of our National Security capabilities to counter the threats of hostile activity. And will do so wherever it may come from.
The UK is admired around the world as a leading light in the global fight against money laundering. And thanks to this Government we now have robust powers to identify and recover criminal funds from those seeking to hide, use or move them in the UK. We can also force individuals to explain the source of their wealth if authorities deem it to be suspicious.
Today we will enhance that reputation further and create an even more hostile environment for those eyeing up UK shores as a place to move their illicit funds by setting out plans to prevent the abuse of the financial instrument known as Scottish Limited Partnerships.
Scottish Limited Partnerships are used by thousands of legitimate British businesses - from pension schemes to owning farm land in Scotland - to invest more than £30 billion in the UK a year.
READ MORE: Staff shortages 'threaten' crackdown on shell firms
We have seen mounting evidence that in their current form they are vulnerable to abuse. Last year it emerged more than 100 Scottish Limited Partnerships were used to launder up to $80bn in the “global laundromat”, a complex and corrupt money laundering scheme that allowed officials to move money out of Russia and around the world.
The Herald itself has continued to shine a spotlight on this issue, reporting their use in alleged complex global money laundering schemes from Brazilian politicians to Russian oligarchs, and in the process shown the value of investigatory reporting.
Last year, we introduced laws requiring Scottish Limited Partnerships to report their beneficial owner which saw an 80% reduction in the number registered. But we know more needs to be done to ensure they continue to be used as a vehicle for legitimate investment in the UK.
The Prime Minister has given serious thought to this matter herself and earlier this week met with the Scottish National Party to discuss the importance of tightening regulations around Scottish Limited Partnerships.
Today we will unveil a package of reforms to subject Scottish Limited Partnerships to more stringent anti-money laundering checks and ensure they are more transparent.
Our proposals will require Scottish Limited Partnerships to have a real UK connection, including ensuring they do business or maintain a service address in the UK.
READ MORE: Russian gang leader jailed for faking metal exports to Scotland
There will be new anti-money laundering checks for frontmen such as registering new Scottish Limited Partnerships through a company formation agent.
We will also give Companies House new powers to remove limited partnerships from the company register if they are dissolved or are no longer operating.
These reforms form part of our modern Industrial Strategy to protect and enhance our business environment, ensuring Scotland and other parts of the UK continue to be known internationally as great places to work, invest and do business. I would like to commend the Herald for its dogged pursuit of this issue in its coverage.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel