MATT Hancock has hailed a "great day for a free and fair press" after MPs narrowly defeated attempts to establish a new inquiry into media and police relations.
The Culture Secretary added the Government would work "closely" with the Independent Press Standards Organisation [Ipso], the self-regulatory body, to ensure its "important work continues".
Former Labour leader Ed Miliband led moves to amend the Data Protection Bill to establish a statutory inquiry dubbed Leveson Part Two.
But this was rejected by 304 votes to 295, majority nine, when pushed to a vote in the Commons - prompting cries of "shame" in the chamber.
Five Conservative MPs rebelled to support the measure, including former ministers Ken Clarke, Dominic Grieve and Crispin Blunt, while Labour's John Grogan rebelled to oppose the amendment.
Ahead of the vote, Mr Hancock confirmed that Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary would be undertaking a review of how police forces were adhering to new media relations guidance - as recommended by Sir Brian Leveson.
He added a person would also be responsible for reviewing standards of the press in Northern Ireland, which DUP MP Ian Paisley suggested could be viewed as a "Leveson for Northern Ireland" - an announcement branded "extraordinary" by Mr Miliband.
A separate Labour bid to introduce a measure forcing publishers not signed up to a state-backed regulator to pay their opponent's legal costs in relation to alleged data breaches even if they won the case also faltered.
The SNP's Brendan O'Hara said his party could not support a "system of press regulation that will be imposed from Westminster on Holyrood" and the amendments later fell after they were not moved to a vote.
Mr Hancock had warned such proposals would have had a "catastrophic" impact on local newspapers and risked making it "near impossible" to uncover stories of abuse.
Reacting to the vote on Leveson part two, Mr Hancock wrote on Twitter: "A great day for a free and fair press."
But Mr Miliband tweeted: "Very disappointed for the victims of phone-hacking and press abuse that we did not win the vote for Leveson 2.
"The battle goes on to keep our promise to them to get the truth they deserve and protection for victims in the future."
Ian Murray, the Society of Editors executive director, welcomed the result, saying: "I am delighted that common sense has prevailed and the attempt to impose appalling penalties on the UK's free press for failing to join a state-recognised regulator has been defeated.
"The defeat of proposals for a costly second inquiry into the press is also to be welcomed. As MPs heard, the press has already taken great steps since the Leveson Inquiry to meet the objectives of that report."
Labour’s Tom Watson, the Shadow Culture Secretary, claimed there had been a "shameless capitulation to press barons" from the Tories which left victims of phone hacking "ever further from reaching the truth".
He said: "No criminal investigation or trial has ever looked at the core questions that Leveson two posed: how the relationship between the press, police and politicians allowed the hacking scandal to happen and attempt to cover it up.
"Today was a chance for MPs to finally deliver on promises made to victims of hacking and press intrusion. That chance has been squandered and victims have been betrayed once again," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel