Plans to let lynx loose in the south of Scotland could scare away more tourists than they attract, environment chiefs have been warned.
The Lynx UK Trust has applied for consent for a trial release of six of the wildcats in Kielder Forest.
But farmers in the Scottish Borders are fearful of attacks on their sheep by Eurasian lynx roaming north into Scotland and oppose the plan.
Now the Northumberland National Park Authority has expressed reservations about them too. A report to a special meeting of the authority, held to agree on a response to Natural England, raises various concerns about the plans.
It comes ahead of a decision to be made by UK Government Environment Secretary Michael Gove on the Lynx release.
The report says: “The suitability of Kielder for a full reintroduction is not proved by the current information available, undermining its potential as a trial site.
“The cost-benefit analysis is likely to have overestimated visitor numbers and spend and underestimated the impact on livestock farming. It would be wise to assess whether the reintroduction of lynx might actually deter people from visiting.
“Some visitors, including families with young children, are sometimes deterred from visiting an area they perceive as too wild.”
Concerns were also raised about the risk posed to sheep, with predictions made that two or three a year would be killed by a six-strong lynx population.
The report added: “The level of potential predation by lynx on sheep in this location is an unknown quantity and can only be assumed from reported figures and grazing conditions in Europe that vary widely. Across Europe, between none and 10.5 sheep per lynx per year have been reported taken. Excluding Norway, where sheep graze in woodlands, the average is 0.4 per lynx per year.
“Where sheep graze close to forest, as in some areas around Kielder, the rate of predation may be higher and may exceed the European average.”
Ettrick, Roxburgh and Berwickshire MSP Rachael Hamilton said: “Legitimate concerns have been raised about the proposed reintroduction for some time, and we still do not have good enough answers.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel