Fashion chain New Look is reviewing its prices after a shopper found that some plus-sized clothes were more expensive than identical styles in smaller sizes.
The retailer said it was “reviewing the pricing structure” of its plus-size collection in a way which “works best for our customers and our business” after shopper Maria Wassell spotted that trousers in its Curves range cost 15% more than a pair in the main collection.
Ms Wassell’s observation has led to some suggesting it is reasonable for retailers to charge more for a garment that uses more material, while others have described it as a “fat tax”.
Ms Wassell, a retail supervisor from Kent, told the Sun newspaper: “It’s like I’m being discriminated against for being plus-size when I’m only slightly bigger than average.
“The average size for a British woman is now a size 16. Plus-size purchases are on the increase. If you look at the statistics, there’s more money being spent on plus-size clothing now then there was even three years ago.”
Ms Wassell said she used to work for a plus-size brand, and described the suggestion that clothes for bigger sizes needed to be more expensive was “basically rubbish”.
New Look said in a statement: “We are in the process of reviewing the pricing structure of our plus-size collection in a way which works best for our customers and our business.
“We are proud of the ranges we offer to our plus-size customers and value all customers, no matter what their body shape or size.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here