Prominent Brexiteer Arron Banks has insisted there is no evidence the anti-EU campaign took Russian money as he faces a grilling form MPs.
Millionaire Leave.UK founder Mr Banks and the organisation’s communications chief Andy Wigmore have promised “fireworks” when they appear before the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee’s fake news inquiry on Tuesday.
Mr Banks agreed to give evidence to the committee after previously pulling out as he accused MPs of conducting a “witch hunt”.
His appearance comes after Prime Minister Theresa May said calls for an inquiry into alleged links between Russia and the campaign to leave the European Union are a matter for the police.
Reports in the Sunday Times claimed Mr Banks held a series of undisclosed meetings with Russian embassy officials around the time of the 2016 referendum campaign.
The paper said it had seen emails showing he also discussed a potential business deal involving six Russian gold mines with ambassador Alexander Yakovenko after being introduced to him by a suspected Russian spy.
Responding to calls for a police inquiry on Nigel Farage’s LBC radio show, Mr Banks said: “What’s the crime? I would like to know what the police are going to investigate – lunch with the Russian ambassador?
“Where’s the evidence we took Russian money? There’s no evidence.”
Mr Banks said he first met the Russian ambassador over a “boozy lunch”.
“We had about four shots of Stalin vodka, brandy, wine. We were pretty trolleyed. The ambassador was probably in a worse state than we were,” he said.
He told Mr Farage there was another lunch meeting and a “cup of tea”, where he was introduced to a businessman involved in the Russian gold mines, but denied using the Brexit campaign to further his business interests.
Asked about allegations he was reporting back to the Russians three days after meeting newly elected Donald Trump, he said: “It’s complete nonsense.”
Asked if there was any Russian money given to Leave.EU, Mr Wigmore insisted: “No, not one penny or one rouble.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here