Royal Bank of Scotland has awarded millions of potentially lucrative share options to top executives under a controversial new bonus plan opposed by a hefty minority of shareholders.
Chief executive Sir Fred Goodwin, head of corporate markets Johnny Cameron, and Larry Fish, head of US subsidiary Citizens, are among the major beneficiaries.
At the bank's annual meeting in April, more than 22% of shareholders voted against the 2007 executive share option plan, which has been introduced to replace a scheme approved by shareholders in 1999. The scheme could see executives including Goodwin gain three times their basic salary - which in his case would amount to £3.6m.
The scheme was criticised by corporate governance adviser PIRC, which questioned an alleged lack of disclosure on the scheme's performance targets, which RBS said would have a direct link to share performance.
RBS announced to the stock market yesterday that it had granted options to 15 senior executives which will vest between 2010 and 2017 at an exercise price of 561p, a level which some might view as low by recent standards. RBS shares closed up 1.5p at 577p last night, but were until recently trading well above £6.
One of the biggest beneficiaries was Goodwin, who was granted options over nearly 700,000 shares. Cameron was granted options over 374,332 shares and Fish over 523,640 shares. Finance director Guy Whittaker and retail markets chief Gordon Pell also received big awards.
RBS did not respond to a request for comment on how it had arrived at the apparently low exercise price.
Speaking at the annual meeting, remuneration committee chairman Bob Scott had stressed that the new shares policy was designed to "attract, motivate and retain high-calibre executives", and insisted the rules had been crafted to meet current best practice.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article