JOHN Woodcock, a prominent Labour critic of Jeremy Corbyn, has quit the party with a scathing attack on the leadership.
In his resignation letter, the MP for Barrow and Furness in Cumbria, said Mr Corbyn would pose a "clear risk to UK national security as Prime Minister".
And Mr Woodcock said that, under his leadership, Labour was no longer "the broad church it has historically been" and there was little chance of returning it to an "inclusive, mainstream electoral force".
The 39-year-old backbencher, had been sitting as an independent since having the Labour whip withdrawn in April, pending investigation of an allegation of sexual harassment.
He denies allegations over supposedly inappropriate texts and emails to a former female staff member between 2014 and 2016.
In his resignation letter, Mr Woodcock dismissed the party's disciplinary process against him as "rigged" and said there was "clear evidence that the process has been manipulated for factional purposes".
He accused Jennie Formby, Labour’s General Secretary, of overturning a previous disciplinary panel ruling and said Mr Corbyn had refused to appoint an independent investigator to rule on his case.
The backbencher claimed to have obtained emails showing that senior party figures were determined to prevent him standing in future elections as a Labour candidate because of his views on Mr Corbyn's leadership.
Mr Woodcock said it was "not credible" for him to expect a fair hearing from Labour and that he would now seek an independent process to hear the case.
It is understood his resignation means the Labour investigation can now not be concluded.
Labour's policy on sexual harassment cases states that cases are anonymised before being assessed by a panel of three members of the ruling National Executive Committee.
If this panel judges that there is a case to answer, they refer it to the disciplinary National Constitutional Committee, which is separate from the party leadership.
A Labour spokesman said: "Jeremy thanks John for his service to the Labour Party."
A former aide to Gordon Brown during his time as prime minister and Shadow Transport Minister under Ed Miliband, Mr Woodcock has been one of the harshest internal critics of Mr Corbyn's leadership of Labour.
He clashed with the leader over his stance on nuclear weapons and anti-Semitism.
And in 2017 he stood for re-election in the Cumbria seat he has represented since 2010, but said he did not believe Mr Corbyn was fit to serve as Prime Minister and would not countenance voting to put him into Downing Street.
In his letter to Mr Corbyn, he wrote: "I have promised to fight for local jobs, promote a credible alternative government, protect the shipyard and ensure the safety of my constitituents through strong defence and national security.
"I now believe more strongly than ever that you have made the Labour Party unfit to deliver those objectives and would pose a clear risk to UK national security as Prime Minister.
"The party for which I have campaigned since I was a boy is no longer the broad church it has always historically been. Anti-Semitism is being tolerated and Labour has been taken over at nearly every level by the hard left, far beyond the dominance they achieved at the height of 1980s militancy.”
He added: "There is little chance of returning the Labour Party to the inclusive, mainstream electoral force my constituents desperately need. In these circumstances, I can no longer justify engaging in a rigged process to be re-admitted to it."
Mr Woodcock said he would continue to serve as independent MP for Barrow and Furness and will "work with the Government when it is trying to do the right thing, and will also work with the many good colleagues who are still trying to do their best in Labour".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here