TOM Watson, Labour’s deputy leader, has suggested the UK Government should order an official investigation into whether or not the EU referendum result was “stolen” by the Russian state.
It is the first time that a member of the Shadow Cabinet has questioned the legitimacy of the 2016 vote.
Mr Watson raised the issue during a question and answer session at the Byline journalism and free speech festival in East Sussex when he suggested there should be a full public inquiry with powers similar to those of the US special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference into the 2016 American presidential election.
The Shadow Culture Secretary later tweeted: “Today I called on the government to confirm the National Crime Agency is investigating Russian links to http://Leave.EU .
“If not, we need a public inquiry. It is time the British people were told whether the EU referendum result was stolen by the Russian state. #BylineFest.”
His Labour colleague Ben Bradshaw, a former Culture Secretary, who has been pressing for more than a year for the Conservative Government to act on reports of Russian interference, tweeted that it was “great to have the Labour front bench weighing in”.
Businessman Arron Banks, who helped found Leave.EU, has repeatedly denied any links between the pro-Brexit campaign and the Russian state.
Also attending the festival, Tory backbencher Damian Collins, who chairs the Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, spoke of the need for a Mueller-style investigation in the UK with powers to compel witnesses and evidence.
“There are places where the committee could not go because we did not have the powers with the consequence that there are lots of grey areas. A special investigator would have the power to compel evidence and witnesses in a way that we were not able to,” said Mr Collins.
Last month, his committee claimed that the UK faced a "democratic crisis" with voters being targeted with "pernicious views" and data being manipulated. It proposed measures to combat election interference.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel