DOUBTS have been cast on a watchdog’s claims Scottish police took prisoners to court in underwear, pyjamas or bare feet.
Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIPS) last week slammed what it called “unacceptable practices” its staff witnessed on a routine visit to Edinburgh Sheriff Court.
Its official report sparked a story in this newspaper and a round of condemnations from prison reformers, who warned of what they called an appalling lack of respect and “human dignity”.
However, official and unofficial sources now suggest details in the report may have been the result of innocent misunderstandings. The Herald understands a prisoner described as being in nightwear had, in fact, insisted on wearing a “onsie” jumpsuit.
Newly appointed Deputy Chief Constable Fiona Taylor yesterday told another watchdog, the Scottish Police Authority that she had reminded custody staff of the need to provide dignity to prisoners.
But she added: “I won’t try to make any excuses when our officers treat any member of the public with less than the respect that they deserve. “However, in these particular sets of circumstances there were some issues around our ability to check that report for factual accuracy before it was published.
“As a consequence some of the material that was published - when I spoke to the custody division - was not their interpretation of the facts on the ground.”
Ms Taylor was speaking after Chief Constable Iain Livingstone described the HMIPS report as “really concerning”.
Sources suggest police custody officers would routinely provide prisoners with clothing and footwear for court if they had lost their own, which happens frequently to people in distress or trouble. Inspectors, they said, may have seen a prisoner without shoes during transportation but that does not mean that person entered court barefoot.
David Hamilton, vice chair of the Scottish Police Federation, said: “HMIPS have made a gratuitous passing comment. Police Scotland should have had the opportunity to fact check.”
Nobody at HMIPS was available for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel