THE EU referendum was “stolen by lawbreakers,” an SNP MP has claimed after campaigners won a High Court challenge against the Electoral Commission over spending by Vote Leave.
The Good Law Project[GLP] brought a judicial review against the elections watchdog, arguing it had failed in its duty to regulate the referendum process ahead of the historic vote in June 2016.
In a ruling today, Mr Justice Leggatt said the Commission had "misinterpreted" the definition of referendum expenses in relation to the Vote Leave campaign.
He said Vote Leave paid £620,000 to Canadian online advertising firm AggregateIQ[AIQ] at the request of another Leave campaigner, Darren Grimes, in the days before the referendum.
This put Vote Leave over its £7 million election spending limit by almost £500,000.
GLP launched the case in October after the Commission concluded there were "no reasonable grounds to suspect" any incorrect reporting of campaign spending or donations by Vote Leave.
However, the watchdog later opened an investigation into the spending of Vote Leave and Mr Grimes and concluded in July that both had incorrectly reported their spending.
Vote Leave was fined £61,000 and Mr Grimes £20,000 fine by the Commission, which referred the matter to the Metropolitan Police.
Deirdre Brock, the SNP MP for Edinburgh North and Leith, who raised the issue of AIQ’s activities during Prime Minister’s Questions this week, said GLP had achieved a “stunning victory,” which was also a searing indictment of the Commission’s failure to act on information received.
“We know that AIQ and Cambridge Analytica were involved in some very questionable behaviour during the EU referendum and now we know that the Leave campaign broke the law in two different ways. The referendum was stolen from the people by law-breakers using shadowy firms and the UK Government needs to tell us how it intends to put that right.”
Ms Brock also repeated her call for Theresa May to come clean about the purpose of a visit to No 10 by AIQ senior representatives given the visit was “not recorded in the usual way”.
The Nationalist backbencher added: “Theresa May can start with acknowledging that the referendum result was not safe and that it was stolen by law-breaking. Then she should seek an extension of the Article 50 negotiations to give time for proper consideration of the options.
"There is already considerable pressure building for a vote on the final Brexit deal but we now know that the initial vote was fundamentally flawed and won only because Leave campaigners broke the law.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel