JEREMY Corbyn has hit out at a former Chief Rabbi for comparing the Labour leader to Enoch Powell.
Rabbi Lord Sacks recently likened the Labour leader’s remarks regarding a group of British Zionists with the late MP's incendiary 1968 "Rivers of Blood" speech.
Mr Corbyn denounced the comparison as "offensive" and "excessive" and insisted he was committed to tackling anti-Semitism.
On BBC1's Andrew Marr Show the party leader urged Jewish people considering leaving the country if he entered No 10 to remain in the UK.
Following a summer dominated by rows over his past conduct and the Labour leadership's response to problems in the party, Mr Corbyn said he was "absolutely not" an anti-Semite.
"I have spent my whole life opposing racism in any form and I will die fighting racism in any form," he declared.
One of the incidents that triggered the row around Mr Corbyn was his apparent defence of a mural by street artist Mear One which was viewed as anti-Semitic.
The Labour leader later admitted that he had not properly looked at the image before raising concerns about plans to paint over it.
Asked if he now believed it was anti-Semitic, he replied: "It shouldn't have been put up."
Another row involved footage from 2013 of Mr Corbyn attacking a group of British Zionists who had criticised Palestinian ambassador Manuel Hassassian, claiming they did not understand "English irony" despite living in the country.
The party leader explained: "It was not intended to be anti-Semitic in any way and I have no intention and have absolutely opposition in every way to anti-Semitism because I can see where it leads to.
"I can see where it leads to now - in Poland, Hungary, in central Europe - I can see where it led to in the past. We have to oppose racism in any form and I do."
The "English irony" comments were condemned by Lord Sacks as "divisive, hateful and like Powell's speech it undermines the existence of an entire group of British citizens by depicting them as essentially alien".
But Mr Corbyn hit back, saying: "I do find that quite hurtful, quite offensive...I say to Rabbi Sacks, with all due respect, that is beyond excessive."
He also defended his presence at a wreath-laying ceremony at the Palestinian Martyrs Cemetery in Tunisia, insisting he was marking the death of "civilians and children" in an Israeli air raid.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, accused him of honouring one of the founders of the Black September terror group which carried out the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre.
But Mr Corbyn said: "I didn't know they were there at the time...I'm not a supporter of Black September, of course.
"I do think that we should always commemorate those that have been killed by bombing raids and that's what I was doing."
Labour has also been embroiled in a row about the definition of anti-Semitism used in its code of conduct following concerns it could curb the ability to criticise Israel.
The party leader said: "It's right that people should be able to discuss the establishment of the state of Israel but recognise the existence of the state of Israel and not prevent that kind of debate."
Asked if he would show remorse to Jewish people, Mr Corbyn replied: "I am an anti-racist and will die an anti-racist. Anti-Semitism is a scourge in any society, I have opposed it all my life and will continue to oppose it all my life.
"Under my leadership in this party we have been more specific about the definition, we have set out much better processes for dealing with incidents within the party and we are improving them even further to make sure that any complaints are dealt with quickly.
"The party must be and is a safe and welcoming place for all communities," he added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel