Strictly Come Dancing star Susannah Constantine has said she would prefer it if the judges gave her more constructive advice and fewer “throwaway comments”.
During the first live show of the series last weekend, the fashion journalist and TV presenter was given just one point by judge Craig Revel Horwood.
He said Constantine, who wore a huge orange dress and pineapple headpiece alongside her professional partner Anton Du Beke, looked like she was “staggering about lost and drunk at a party”.
Responding to the comments, she said: “I thought they were pretty fair and, you know, I would like a bit more.
“If someone is going to give a throwaway comment it would be quite nice to get some constructive advice afterwards.
“Otherwise it’s a bit pointless, isn’t it? Oh well, if I look like (I’m at) a drunken party, how can I improve, what can I do to not look like that?”
Constantine, 56, added that she was “genuinely pleased” by the 12 points she received overall for her first time on the dance floor.
She said her training for her second stint on the dance floor has been “tiring, exhilarating, an emotional rollercoaster, but fantastic”.
“I’m definitely getting fitter,” she added.
“The next day I feel stronger, and not tired at all. I feel I am able to remember steps a little bit more this time.
“It’s very difficult because you go from Latin to ballroom. It’s like being an embryonic dancer all over again. It’s like starting from scratch all over again.”
Saturday night saw Constantine and Du Beke perform a foxtrot to Frank Sinatra’s They Can’t Take That Away From Me for their second routine of the series.
The fashion expert also revealed she had given Strictly’s dressmakers instructions on what clothes she refuses to dance in.
She said: “I have two rules: one is not to have a high neck because it’s unflattering to my big boobs.
“The other is to keep my arms covered, because they are showing their age.
“But other than that I am open to everything.”
The first celebrity will leave the competition in the first results show of the series, on Sunday at 7.15pm on BBC One.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here