NICOLA Sturgeon has appeared to move away from announcing a “precise timescale” on a second referendum this autumn, saying she will merely set out the “next steps” instead.
The First Minister repeatedly used the more modest phrase in an interview with the BBC.
In June last year, when she reset plans for a new vote after the SNP lost a third of its MPs in the election, she told Holyrood she would return with an update this autumn.
She promised her view “on the precise timescale for offering people a choice over the country’s future”.
But asked about the timing of a referendum on the Andrew Marr Show, Ms Sturgeon made no reference to any timescale.
She said: “I will set out what I think the next steps are when we are at the end of this phase of negotiations. When Theresa May comes back with the [Brexit] deal, we will judge that.
“It looks as if might be November. I will set out my views on the next steps at that stage.”
Pressed on whether she would tell people the timing of second referendum before Christmas, she said again: “I will set out my views on the next steps at that stage.”
Any watering down of her previous commitment will add to frustration among Yes campaigners about the slow progress toward a referendum.
A new poll suggests Scots would vote 52-48 for independence if there was a chaotic No Deal Brexit.
Ms Sturgeon also said the SNP still had work to do making the case for independence, and voters would deserve a detailed proposition.
Asked if she thought Brexit made Scottish independence inevitable, she said: “I think Scottish independence will happen. If you’re asking me to use the term inevitable, I guess yes I would use that. I think we’re on a journey that will end with independence.”
On the BBC Sunday Politics Show, SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford was unable to say if there would be a second referendum before the next Holyrood election in 2021.
He will tell the SNP conference in Glasgow: “The democratic outrage of Brexit is crystallising the case for Scotland having the full control over its own affairs - no wonder that polls are showing support for independence at record high levels.”
SNP strategist Kevin Pringle said there was “little prospect” of a referendum before 2021 and the SNP and Greens should try to get a clear mandate at the next election instead.
He said it had been relatively easy to secure the referendum after the 2011 Scottish election because then Prime Minister David Cameron assumed it would be a “walk in the park”.
However, now, with the polls showing consistently strong support for independence, the UK government had “no reason to enter into a referendum unless it really has to”.
He said if people could be persuaded to vote for one of the pro-referendum parties, that could translate into support for a Yes vote.
Former SNP cabinet secretary Alex Neil also said that Ms Sturgeon would need to secure a new mandate at the 2021 election to secure a referendum and be more radical to win it.
The Brexiter said that the party would lose if it stuck with plans to rejoin the EU after Brexit.
In a newspaper article, he wrote: “Sticking with our current policy that an independent Scotland would rejoin the EU would be a huge mistake and could cost us victory in Indyref2.”
Labour MSP Neil Findlay said: “The First Minister isn’t standing up for Scotland by continuing to threaten to divide Scotland with another referendum.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel