BRITAIN will get a Brexit "upside dividend" if it can agree good withdrawal terms with Brussels, Philip Hammond has insisted, pointing to the prospect of more money for public spending and tax cuts.
The Chancellor made the claim as he explained how the last 10 days had seen "a measurable change in pace" in the Brexit negotiations, although many challenges remained ahead to secure a deal.
Mr Hammond is due to present a crunch Budget - the last currently due before the UK quits the EU next March - at the end of October.
The idea of a "Brexit dividend" has previously been floated by Theresa May, who suggested it was a way to part-fund a £20.5 billion-a-year boost to the NHS budget.
However, its validity has been questioned, including from within the Conservative Party.
Mr Hammond, speaking to reporters at the International Monetary Fund's annual meeting in Bali, said: "If we are successful in negotiating that package, there will be an upside dividend in terms of the economy and, consequently, the fiscal numbers, so that's the first bonus.
"The second bonus is that I've been holding a slightly larger fiscal buffer than would otherwise be necessary because of the degree of uncertainty that exists at the moment.
"As that uncertainty is unwound and we're in more favourable circumstances, logically, one would need less of a fiscal buffer and some of that could be released to support the spending envelope or to deliver tax cuts.”
The Chancellor spoke the day after the Office for Budget Responsibility warned that the UK's economy and public finances were likely to be weaker as a result of the Brexit vote than they would have been if the country had decided to stay in the European Union.
A discussion paper by the Government's independent economic forecaster also indicated that a no-deal Brexit could have a "severe short-term impact" on the economy and potentially lead to a sharp fall in asset prices.
Speaking to the BBC this morning, Mr Hammond added that he had always been optimistic about a deal because it was "clearly in the interests of both sides to do so".
He added: "What has happened over the last week, 10 days, is there has been a measurable change in pace. There is a real sense now of engagement from both sides, of shared enterprise in trying to solve a problem rather than posturing towards each other. A really important step change.
"But that shouldn't conceal the fact that we have some big differences left to resolve. Process is a lot more positive this week, substance still very challenging.
"If we are able to get to a good deal for Britain as we leave the European Union I believe there will be a dividend, a deal dividend for us."
The Chancellor said securing a finalised withdrawal agreement at next week's Brussels summit would be "highly ambitious".
He told CNBC: "Well, it is very ambitious and I am not conducting the negotiations. There are people in Brussels right now working hard at this.
"But what is very clear is that we have to make significant progress by the time of the October Council to show that we are on track, that we are moving forward and that it would be, if we don't reach a deal in October, at least we are making sufficient progress that everyone can see it is sensible to come together again in November for that last push to get there."
John McDonnell, his Labour Shadow, dismissed Mr Hammond’s remarks as “good old-fashioned spin”.
He said: “It looks like Hammond is desperate to save his and the Prime Minister's skins by dressing up a classic 'put it off' fudge as a deal, which will fail to provide the long-term security and certainty investors and businesses need.
"It appears that Hammond is planning a few tax conjuring tricks in the Budget to kid people that austerity is over when the reality is that the vast bulk of the cuts are still rolling out. We need a Chancellor not a conjuror," added the Shadow Chancellor.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel