New sanctions on countries which use chemical weapons will help “redraw the red line” on the use of the “horrific” substances, Jeremy Hunt said.
The Foreign Secretary’s comments came as the European Union prepared to formally adopt a new regime which will allow for asset freezes and travel bans to be imposed on individuals linked to chemical weapons use.
The new sanctions system is expected to be approved at a meeting of foreign ministers in Luxembourg on Monday and follows the Novichok nerve agent attack in Salisbury which has been blamed on agents from Russia’s GRU military intelligence service.
It also comes in the wake of chemical weapons attacks in Syria which have been blamed on Russia’s allies in Bashar Assad’s regime.
Mr Hunt said: “For years there has been an international taboo on the use of chemical weapons, but that is at risk now after Syria and Salisbury.
“We now need to redraw the red line that says that for anyone using these horrific weapons, the price will always be too high.
“These new sanctions are vital, but they are not the end of the story.”
The new regime tabled by France and the UK will make it more straightforward for EU sanctions to be applied in respect of the use or proliferation of chemical weapons anywhere in the world.
Mr Hunt will also use the meeting to push for discussions on a new cyber-related sanctions regime.
The GRU’s activities in cyberspace have been highlighted by the UK and its allies in recent weeks, with Russian hackers blamed for attacks including an attempt to infiltrate the systems of the chemical weapons watchdog in The Hague.
Ahead of the Foreign Affairs Council meeting, Mr Hunt is hosting counterparts from eight countries – Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Croatia and Romania – at his Chevening country retreat.
The timing of the gathering comes at a critical point in the Brexit process, with EU leaders set to meet on Wednesday to consider progress in the talks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel