Workers in Edinburgh could save around £82,000 by commuting to the city rather than living there, according to new analysis.
Research by the Bank of Scotland found the difference in house prices between the capital and locations around an hour away would be enough to pay for the current annual rail cost (£2,299) for 35 years.
Homes in sites including Dunblane, Glasgow, Motherwell, Dunfermline and Kirkcaldy cost £170,927 on average – £82,088 lower than the average price in Edinburgh city centre (£253,015).
A 30-minute commute could save homebuyers £80,671 with the average price for a home in places such as North Berwick, Dunbar, Livingston, Falkirk and Bathgate at £172,345.
In contrast, it is more expensive to have a longer commute to Glasgow.
A 15-minute commute from a town such as Paisley would see homebuyers paying £124,319, 29% less than the average house price in Glasgow city centre (£174,688).
An hour commute from areas including Edinburgh, Perth and Dumfries pushes house prices up to £227,525, 30% (£52,837) higher than in the city centre.
The study suggests Kirkcaldy is the most affordable town to live in for those travelling to Edinburgh, whereas Greenock offers the best value for money for Glasgow commuters.
Graham Blair, mortgages director at Bank of Scotland, said: “Many people have a desire to buy near their place of work to escape the morning commute.
“However, for some towns and cities, the premium this comes with can price out the average buyer.
“With savings to be gained, it is an attractive pull for any potential purchaser to look further afield.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel