Scottish Conservative interim leader Jackson Carlaw has branded the SNP’s first 18 months at the helm of Scotland’s biggest council as an “abject failure”.
The Tory MSP argued the Glasgow City Council minority administration has failed in a number of areas, from nursery charges to its response to the Glasgow School of Art fire.
Mr Carlaw was expected to focus on the SNP’s record in the city in his first major speech as interim leader at the party’s West Region conference on Saturday.
He is stepping for Ruth Davidson while she takes maternity leave.
The SNP formed a minority administration in Glasgow after winning the highest number of seats in the 2017 local government elections, rebranding the ruling group of councillors as the “city government”.
The council came under fire earlier this year for accepting an anonymous donation of a Rolls Royce for use as the Lord Provost’s car.
The move came as the local authority prepared to increase nursery fees by 57%.
Meanwhile, the authority also attracted criticism over its response to two major fires in the city centre, including at the Glasgow School of Art in June.
Some businesses expressed frustration over lack of action to provide access and mitigate against lost trade.
Mr Carlaw said: “The SNP won power in Glasgow and immediately claimed it would change things for the better, even having the temerity to rebrand itself as a ‘city government’.
“But as we approach the 18-month milestone, it’s clear the SNP’s reign up to now has been an abject failure.
“Just like everything with the SNP, a host of warm-worded statements have been followed by inaction and disappointment.
“The people of Glasgow are now experiencing what those in other SNP-run administrations have endured for years.”
An SNP spokeswoman said: “The SNP have been a breath of fresh air for Glasgow and are totally focused on delivering better services for communities right across the city.
“The Tories can whinge from the sidelines if they want – but it is their colleagues’ shambolic Brexit plans which pose the biggest threat to jobs, living standards and local communities the length and breadth of Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel