ALEX Salmond’s legal action against the Scottish Government over the handling of alleged sexual misconduct complaints enters open court today.
Lawyers for the two sides are due to appear before Lord Pentland at the Court of Session for a procedural hearing.
The hearing is to see if the parties are ready to proceed to a full judicial review hearing, which has provisionally been set down to start on January 15 and last four days.
Mr Salmond, 63, strongly denies sexual harassment and criminality.
The former First Minister launched the legal action last August against the government and its most senior civil servant, the permanent secretary Leslie Evans.
It followed two female civil servants making allegations of sexual misconduct against Mr Salmond in January relating to his time as First Minister in 2013.
The complaints prompted an investigation ultimately overseen by Ms Evans, who told Mr Salmond in August that she intended to make a public statement on the matter.
Mr Salmond took early legal action in an attempt to stop any publicity around the case, but details emerged in the media regardless.
The government’s most senior law officer, the Lord Advocate, James Wolffe QC, also advised the matter be referred to the police, who are conducting their own inquiry.
Following publicity around the complaints, Mr Salmond resigned from the SNP after 45 years as a member, 20 of them as the party’s leader.
He strongly criticised Ms Evans, who has been defended by Nicola Sturgeon.
Backed by £100,000 of donations from a crowd-funder appeal he linked to independence, Mr Salmond is now seeking a judicial review of the way the complaint process was handled by the government he once led.
He says he did not receive a fair chance to put his side of events.
If the court agrees with Mr Salmond, the most likely outcome is for the Scottish Government to be asked to reconsider its approach to the complaints.
The Police Scotland inquiry continues on its own separate track.
It is unaffected by whether Mr Salmond wins or loses his judicial review.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel