Scott Myles's third show at the Modern Institute is a curious one. It offers a welter of contradictions, a flurry of loosely expressed connections to art history and to Myles' own practice and, taken as a whole, verges on the bewildering.
The show opens with a set of four flat sculptures, affixed to the gallery walls by the edge. Each is made from aluminium, with decorative surfaces, marbled in pretty pink and sickly violet hues. The marbling is, in turn, overlaid by matte black screen-printed sections, suggestive of letter-forms. Between them, lying on the floor, is a bronze cast of a bog-standard stackable plastic chair, its surface painted with crude approximations of light and shadow. Next door in the second gallery is another bronze. This time a stern pillar is similarly overpainted and a triangular shelf supports its own mirror image, and both are marbled, this time in monochrome black and white.
All display a restless to-and-fro of ideas. The crafted marbling of the wall-sculptures denies their minimalist heft, and, while their placement suggests signage, that suggestion is denied by the illegibility of the printed letters. The chair is upended, calling to mind Duchamp's fountain, even though it is a bronze, offering up the old chestnut of turning a quotidian object into a monumental, museum-bound sculpture. Then there's the crude painted coating of the chair and its companion column, a sort of expressionist gloss obliterating the other allusions contained within the work. It's as if Myles is latching on to art movements and pressing them together according to some impenetrable scheme of his own devising.
Some works also seem to require a familiarity with Myles' past practice, which has ranged far and wide, from work firmly in the conceptual camp to performance to the sculptural pieces of the sort seen here. For a past project, Myles collected posters given away at exhibitions by the late Cuban artist Felix Gonzalez-Torres, drew on the reverse side and displayed the results in perspex cabinets. And, for an earlier show at the Modern Institute, he presented a bus shelter, its perspex siding slathered with white paint. Now, in the second room of the Modern Institute's main gallery, we find a perspex display case, slowly revolving on a plinth, some of its panels imprinted with smoky black whorls of paint. It's possible that Myles is fond of perspex for its material qualities, but he's quietly building a set of associations between his work, past and present, so that, say, the tension between acquired readymades - the bus shelter, the bookcase, even the Gonzalez-Torres posters - and Myles' drawing and painting hand is emphasised over time. Does it matter if a visitor to this latest show is unfamiliar with Myles' prior art? Maybe. Without this hint of subtle continuity, of an ongoing conversation between seemingly separate works, the display case feels like an awkward addition to the show, tenuously linked to its fellows by those wisps of black, but adrift.
Similarly adrift, for any viewer, are a pair of works relating to Lawrence Sterne's The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman. Sterne's piling up of reference and allusion, his appreciable, overt influences, the slow revelation of structure through the association of ideas in Tristram Shandy, and even the slow serial publication of the novel are an obvious fit for Myles interlocking, evolving practice, but his treatment of the novel as a source is surprising.
Hidden away in the gallery's office space is an etching based on a full stop from an edition of Tristram Shandy. It is barely recognisable as such and, in fact, the pulpy surface of the paper and the spreading ink on its surface call to mind, of all things, an indistinct portrait of an eighteenth-century gentleman. Outside in the gallery proper hangs a large colour photograph that initally appears blank, but on closer inspection reveals another full stop at its centre, this time actual size, and taken, the title tells us, from a bootleg edition of Sterne's opus. Perhaps this is a winking approach to the readymade, elevating the status of a humble piece of punctuation. But, if that's the case, what are we to make of Myles blowing up the "official" mark to monumental scale, and putting the bootleg version in its tiny place?
He might be underlining the authenticity or otherwise of works such as the chair sculpture, he might be adopting Tristram Shandy as an influence in as neutral a way as possible, or he might be up to something that will become clear in two or three years' time, as future installations return to Sterne.
On paper, this might all sound tiresome, but in the flesh the game of reference and counter-reference Myles plays is appealing: the work of untangling the ideas behind these objects is its own reward.
- Scott Myles: Askit is at The Modern Institute until October 13.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article