A senior peer who was accused of groping a woman and promising her a peerage for sex says he hopes a decision by the House of Lords to block his immediate suspension “means the end of my ordeal”.
Lord Lester of Herne Hill was facing the longest suspension in modern parliamentary history after an inquiry found the 82-year-old had sexually harassed Jasvinder Sanghera and offered her “corrupt inducements” to sleep with him.
The Lords Privileges and Conduct Committee recommended he should be suspended until June 2022.
But on Thursday, peers backed a call to send his case back to the Lords’ Committee for Privileges and Conduct by 101 votes to 78, amid claims that the investigation was “manifestly unfair”.
Following a lengthy and impassioned debate, members agreed that the Commissioner for Standards Lucy Scott-Moncrieff had failed to comply with the code of conduct which required her to act “in accordance with the principles of natural justice and fairness”.
In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, Lord Lester – who denies the allegations against him and says they are “completely untrue” – said the decision was “a triumph for Parliament, and for equal justice under the law”.
The prominent QC blasted the investigation process, and said he had been “treated despicably”.
He told the paper: “I hope this means the end of my ordeal. But I also hope it means the introduction of long-delayed reform, and a new, fairer procedure to combat sex discrimination against women and girls.
“It’s vital this encourages genuine victims to come forward, while protecting those accused.”
Women’s rights campaigner Ms Sanghera, who was not identified in the committee’s report but has waived her right to anonymity, branded the House of Lords’ decision a “complete disgrace”.
Speaking to the Press Association shortly after the vote on Thursday, she said: “It was as if my greatest fear was developing before my very eyes.
“Watching it has made me feel abused all over again, even bullied. These were his chums, his peers, I didn’t feel as if anyone there was speaking for me.
“What does it say about justice when his friends are making the decision about sanctions?
“He has an advantage over the victim.”
Ms Sanghera, a campaigner against forced marriage, had been working with Lord Lester on the passage of a parliamentary bill when the alleged incident occurred in 2006.
According to her statement to the commissioner, Ms Sanghera said the peer had told her that if she slept with him he would make her a baroness “within a year”, but if she refused he would ensure she never gained a seat in the Lords.
She finally lodged a complaint in November 2017 with the rise of the #MeToo movement.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel