Jeremy Corbyn needs to “come off the fence” and back another vote on EU membership, according to one of his MPs.
Speaking on the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland, Ian Murray, the MP for Edinburgh South, said he believed a call for a second referendum – or People’s Vote – could command a majority in the House of Commons if supported by the Labour frontbench.
Other opposition parties have been pressing Mr Corbyn to call a motion of no confidence in Theresa May’s Government. Labour, as the official opposition at Westminster, is the only party able to do so.
However, the Labour leader has ruled out the move, which could trigger a general election, until he can be sure of winning the vote.
Mr Murray said: “The Labour Party will have to come off the fence on that at some point pretty soon because I think what they’re trying to do might be incompatible with what’s available.
“There’s a majority of MPs that would stop a no-deal scenario from happening so that could be taken off the table.
“I think we can get a majority around a People’s Vote because we need to try and break the impasse between now and the 29th of March.”
Mr Murray said that cross-party talks in Parliament are ongoing to try and push for another EU vote.
Mr Murray said: “There’s a growing number of Conservative backbenchers, and it’s not just the usual people that are doing this in terms of supporting a People’s Vote – we’ve got Guto Bebb who’s supporting it, Jo Johnson’s come on board recently. There’s a growing number of Conservative MPs.
“So we do need to get the Labour frontbench into a position of a People’s Vote and if we can do that, I think we can command a majority in the House and I think that’s the best way to go.
“We’ve got to ask ourselves why we came into politics. I didn’t come into politics to make my constituents and the country poorer.
“And therefore, given what’s on the table is the worst of all worlds and given there’s an impasse in Parliament, the public should be brought back into this process democratically.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel