One-quarter of women have been tricked into getting pregnant by their partners piercing condoms, lying about vasectomies and using emotional blackmail to force them into having a baby, a new study found.
The women who all attended sexual and reproductive clinics became pregnant against their will and reported they were not being allowed take control of their contraception.
They said they were subject to control or coercion over their reproductive lives, a British review of American studies has found.
The review found that control over women’s reproductive choices was “common”, with one- quarter of women in US studies over seven years reporting that they had experienced it.
One of the report’s authors, Professor Sam Rowlands, said there was no research on UK women so the scale of the problem was unknown, but he imagined the proportion would be similar.
Mr Rowlands, a doctor and visiting professor at Bournemouth University, said UK health professionals were missing chances to help women who are facing pressure over getting or staying pregnant.
He said: “I think we do need to replicate some of these studies, just to be sure that it’s happening, but most of us who have worked in women’s health, we know from talking to women that this definitely happens, so I think it’s not whether it happens, but it’s whether it happens to the same extent as some countries. And then also people need to be thinking about training, and getting people to raise this a bit more proactively in consultations, and then how to handle it when you find it.”
The report, published in the British Medical Journal, analysed nine studies on the prevalence of reproductive control in women from 2010 to 2017. It defines the phenomenon as “actions that interfere with a woman’s reproductive intentions and any actions that pressurise a woman into initiating or terminating pregnancy”.
Primarily carried out by intimate partners, it can also be perpetrated by the wider family and in organised crime, with young people and ethnic minorities particularly vulnerable.
Actions include emotional blackmail, threats of violence, pressure to continue or end a
pregnancy or to not use certain types of contraception.
It also includes “contraceptive sabotage”, such as a male partner falsely saying they have had a vasectomy, piercing condoms before use, or “stealthing”, where a condom is covertly removed during sex.
Some women may not have insight into their relationship, especially if there is no physical or sexual violence, as they may become inured to the control being exerted on them.
Describing how it could manifest, Mr Rowlands said: “I think it is like a spectrum, at the worst extreme end there probably is violence and extreme things going on like food deprivation, on the other end it’s really just a kind of psychologically controlling atmosphere – keeping tabs on everything the woman is doing, maybe being restrictive over when she goes out.”
However, Mr Rowlands said that, for many women, the issue was not being raised during consultations. He said there were no UK guidelines or advice for health professionals, the majority of whom “were not terribly aware and would not be thinking about raising this”.
Health professionals who were conscious of it were responding on an individual basis to individual patients, he said.
The report is calling for screening to take place in maternity, sexual and reproductive health and abortion services and GP surgeries, with a set of questions already devised.
Professionals should be alert to its possibility. Where women say they are being controlled, professionals may advise them on “concealable” methods of contraception.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel