The general secretary of the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) is to hold a summit with senior figures in his organisation over his lucrative outside interests.
Grahame Smith made the offer last week after it was pointed out his counterpart south of the Border, Frances O’Grady, would not benefit financially if she sat on public boards.
The STUC’s governing general council (GC) last year considered the “adequacy” of the processes for board appointments for members of its secretariat, which includes Smith, and members of the GC.
A committee was asked to map the bodies the STUC is represented on, review procedures for agreeing and reporting outside positions, propose a process where invitations are cleared by the GC, and create a register of interest for senior STUC figures. The committee was also asked to review the remuneration packages received by figures including Smith and look at how the monies could best be recouped for the STUC.
However, a paper drawn up for the committee flagged up difficulties with ideas such as recovering fees and requiring clearance for outside posts.
The paper was expected to be considered at a meeting of the GC last week, but it is understood Smith proposed discussing the issues with office-bearers at a separate meeting. This was agreed.
One insider said an important factor was the claim that O’Grady, who leads the TUC, would not get paid if she sat on boards. The source believes reform in the STUC is now “inevitable”. The committee paper, leaked to this newspaper, irked supporters of reform as they believed it placed obstacles in the way of change.
Regarding future procedures for the GC to clear invitations to serve on bodies, the paper sounded a cautious note: “If the general council wishes to introduce such conditions, including sanctions in relation to non-compliance, it will have to consider the contractual issues involved.”
The paper continued: “This will require an agreed or imposed variation to the current contractual arrangements between the general secretary/secretariat and the STUC and will require to be reasonable and proportionate and consistent with fair work principles.”
On the issue of outside remuneration packages, the paper appeared to suggest any solution could be a long way off: “Until all the bodies on which the STUC is represented have been mapped, a register of interest established, the constitutional issues clarified and variations to the current contractual arrangements between the general secretary/secretariat and the STUC agreed or imposed, it will not be possible to determine existing remuneration packages.” It added that, at present, outside remuneration is only available in relation to appointments over which the STUC/GC has “no locus”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here