Health experts have warned Scottish hospitals are at risk of an outbreak of a new potentially deadly superbug unless attitudes towards screening change.
Rates of antibiotic-resistant bacteria carbapenemase producing enterobacteriaceae (CPE)
in Scotland are relatively low compared to other parts of Europe, the US, India and Africa.
READ MORE: Scandal grows over infection death crisis at Queen Elizabeth University Hospital
But a study by researchers at Glasgow Caledonian University (GCU) found there is a lack of awareness among health professionals and the public about the threat of CPE.
More than 30 per cent of nurses questioned in a nationwide survey were unaware of the emerging risk of CPE and the same proportion thought taking rectal swabs from patients, the best screening method was unacceptable.
In the survey, 450 nursing staff from all Scottish health board areas and 261 members of the public were asked a series of questions to find out what they knew about CPE and the acceptability of rectal swabs.
Lead study author Professor Kay Currie, GCU School of Health and Life Sciences associate dean, research, said: “This is very important research because it will be used to educate nurses and raise awareness among the general public, which will increase uptake of screening and help prevent an outbreak of this very dangerous resistant bacteria in the UK.
READ MORE: Claim NHS Glasgow board 'kept in dark' over deadly pigeon bug
“CPE is a growing threat to our healthcare system and we really want to try to stop it becoming endemic in our hospitals because it’s extremely difficult to treat and get rid of once it takes hold.”
The bacteria lives harmlessly in the gut in healthy people but can be extremely dangerous if it gets into the bloodstream, urine or surgical wounds and causes an infection.
Half of nurses surveyed said they had not been informed about their hospital’s policy and procedures for CPE screening and less than 50% felt the consequences of CPE to their patients were so severe that screening was a priority.
Almost 70% of nurses questioned in the survey thought members of the public would be embarrassed by a rectal swab and 74% said they would ask patients to do the test themselves despite the fact this method may be unreliable.
The majority of members of the public surveyed strongly agreed providing a rectal swab was acceptable, contrary to nurses’ perceptions.
More than 80% of members of the public said they knew about the growing problem of drug-resistant bacteria but only 23% had heard of CPE.
As a result of the research, NHS Education for Scotland is developing new online educational resources for nurses to help them understand that the public are not as embarrassed by the rectal swab test as they think.
Professor Jacqui Reilly, lead consultant for healthcare associated infection, antimicrobial resistance and infection control at Health Protection Scotland (HPS), said: “Antibiotic resistance is one of the greatest threats to our healthcare system.
“Early identification of those patients coming into hospitals who may be at risk of getting an infection, such as one caused by CPE, is critical to stopping the onward transmission of these infections to other patients.
“This study demonstrates the importance of ensuring any screening programme, for the identification and prevention of these infections, is based on an understanding of the important public health principle of acceptability.
“HPS will use these findings to inform further development of the CPE screening programme, in order to ensure we make it easy for staff and patients to do the right thing to protect health.”
The research has been published in the BMC journal Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here