Thousands of people have signed a petition calling for a review of the decision to grant an absolute discharge to a student found guilty of sexual assault.
A statement from the Judicial Office for Scotland states first offender Christopher Daniel was “discharged absolutely” after he was found guilty at Dumbarton Sheriff Court.
Noting that Sheriff Gerard Sinclair had considered all the relevant factors in the case, the statement said: “In light of the evidence as to the immaturity of the accused, and the nature of the discussion during which he admitted his actions, the sheriff considered the offence to be the result of an entirely inappropriate curiosity of an emotionally naive teenager rather than for the purpose of sexual gratification.
“The accused had appeared both noticeably immature and socially awkward, features confirmed by other evidence in the case. It was fortunate that the complainer appeared to have suffered no injury or long lasting effects.”
It said any recorded conviction for the offence would have “serious consequences in terms of the accused`s future career” and any sentence would mean Daniel would “probably be unable to continue his university course”.
It concluded: “Considering all of these factors, the sheriff reached the conclusion that justice could be served in this case by taking the wholly exceptional decision not to pass sentence and to grant an absolute discharge.”
A petition set up calling for a review of the sheriff’s decision gathered thousands of signatures in a single day.
Marisa Keegan started the petition on Friday calling for Justice Secretary Humza Yousaf to review the case.
On the petition page, she wrote: “Our system is putting criminals’ careers before our children’s welfare.
“What kind of world do we live in that this is seen as an acceptable decision by the court?”
She added: “This decision is wrong. This sets an example for other sexual offenders and for sexual assault victims of what can happen if they come forward.”
By Saturday evening, more than 2,500 people had signed the petition.
Conservative MSP Liam Kerr raised the case at First Minister’s Questions on Thursday, telling Nicola Sturgeon the sheriff’s decision had “devastated” the victim’s family.
Ms Sturgeon said: “I absolutely understand the concerns that have been expressed about what has been reported about this sentence, but the sentencing decision in any criminal case is entirely a matter for the judge.
“The judiciary acts entirely independently on the basis of the facts and circumstances of individual cases. They will take into account a wide range of factors, including the age of the offender and any previous convictions.
“I understand the concerns, but we must protect the principle in this country that sentencing decisions are not a matter for politicians, however controversial and difficult they can be for the public. Sentencing decisions are rightly and properly matters for judges.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here