Michael Jackson’s estate has criticised a US TV network’s decision to air a documentary that includes claims from two men that the superstar molested them.
A 10-page letter offers a meeting with HBO executives to try to discredit the stories of the two men, Wade Robson and James Safechuck, featured in the documentary Leaving Neverland.
The estate contends the men are lying and that court filings and story inconsistencies prove that.
The letter, written by estate lawyer Howard Weitzman, criticises the documentary for focusing solely on Mr Robson and Mr Safechuck’s stories and not interviewing anyone from Jackson’s family, his estate or others who knew him.
It states Robson had sought work on a Jackson-themed Cirque du Soleil show and raised the molestation allegations only after he wasn’t hired.
The first instalment of the four-hour documentary will air on HBO on March 3, with the second half airing the following night.
HBO said in a statement after the letter’s release: “Our plans remain unchanged. … Dan Reed is an award-winning filmmaker who has carefully documented these survivors’ accounts. People should reserve judgment until they see the film.”
Both Mr Robson and Mr Safechuck both alleged they were molested and unsuccessfully sued Jackson’s estate after the singer’s June 2009 death. Robson gave evidence in Jackson’s defence at a 2005 molestation trial that ended with the singer’s acquittal.
Director Dan Reed has said he intentionally focused on the stories of Robson and Safechuck.
“Anyone who sees the film will know it is solely about hearing the stories of two specific individuals and their families in their own words, and that is a focus we are very proud of,” Mr Reed said in a previous statement.
Mr Weitzman’s letter includes an offer to meet with HBO executives to discuss the film, and states that if the network cares about ethical standards “this documentary will never air on HBO”.
“We know that this will go down as the most shameful episode in HBO’s history,” Mr Weitzman’s letter said.
“We know that Michael’s devoted fans, and all good people in the world, will not swiftly forgive HBO for its conduct.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here