A drone attack which brought travel chaos to thousands of passengers at Gatwick Airport was reportedly an "inside job".
A disgruntled employee is suspected to be the person responsible for flying the drone, which saw 1,000 flights cancelled and affected an estimated 140,000 passengers.
Police believe either a current or former employee was behind the December 19 incident, The Times reported.
Sussex Police were criticised for their handling of the drone attack, after wrongly arresting a couple and later suggesting there may not have been a drone at all.
Read more: Letters - Gatwick and the silver lining
The investigation has led officers to believe the attack must have been carried out by someone who would understand the layout of the airport.
The Whitehall source also claimed the drone could have “hidden” behind structures and buildings.
“[The drone pilot] knew the blind spots for it, where it could not be ‘hit’. It was clearly someone with really good knowledge of Gatwick, someone who had worked there,” the source said.
“Hypothetically it could have been a disgruntled employee.”
Gatwick Airport Limited had previously offered a £50,000 reward through Crimestoppers, for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for the incident.
A spokeswoman for Sussex Police said: “We are keeping an open mind about who is responsible and their motives.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel