The Brexit process and steps needed to be taken for Scotland to become an independent country have been compared in a new report.
The Scottish Centre on European Relations (SCER) study compares the UK leaving the EU with a deal which includes an indefinite customs union, with Scotland leaving the UK and being in, or acceding to, the EU.
READ MORE: Herald poll: Scotland should have independence referendum after Brexit
It considers nine key areas; Sovereignty, democracy, divorce (concerning the splitting of assets and liabilities), political divisions, future relationships, relationships with the EU, new laws and regulatory bodies, relationships with the rest of the world, and borders/economic impacts.
The report suggests there would be greater certainty for a future independent Scotland-UK relationship, due in part to the EU having agreed arrangements by that time with Britain over its relationship - assuming an independent Scotland would be a member of the EU.
It also indicates lessons could be learned from the Scottish independence referendum in 2014 and the EU vote in 2016 in relation to how the process is conducted, as well as learning from how UK-EU law is either adopted or changed through Brexit.
The question of a border between Scotland and England is raised in the report as potentially causing frictions, however, it indicates this could be better understood when the UK's relationship with the EU is made clear.
The report states the untangling and splitting of shared liabilities could prove more difficult than the UK's split from the EU.
It said: "Shared assets and liabilities and how to split them up would probably be a much tougher negotiation issue in the case of independence than for Brexit - not least the question of North Sea oil and gas, debt, defence assets, the siting of Trident on the Clyde, pensions, reciprocal rights to access public services and so on.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Scotland will be independent in five years
"Some might, eventually, be resolved on a per capita split basis but the talks would be difficult. And the still debated issue of whether an independent Scotland would continue to use the pound - for which there is no comparison in the Brexit talks - would potentially intrude Brexit."
Dr Kirsty Hughes, SCER director, said: "There are, unsurprisingly, similarities and differences between the Brexit process and a likely future independence process. But overall the two are more different than similar.
"This is not surprising given that the UK is a sovereign state (whether in or outside the EU) while Scotland today is not a state but would become one on independence.
"If an independent Scotland were in the European Union, there would be more clarity over its future position and over a chunk of its future relationship with the UK, than the UK has in terms of its future relationship with the EU."
Pamela Nash, chief executive of Scotland in Union, said: "This report spells out in black and white that an independent Scotland would lead to a border between our friends, family and neighbours in England.
"As well as the devastating impact of dividing people, this would have a catastrophic impact on our economy, with 60% of our trade with the rest of the UK.
"The Brexit negotiations have proved just how difficult it is to break up unions, and our relationship with the rest of the UK is far more entwined than with the EU, so the divorce talks would be lengthy and costly.
"Rather than dividing people and putting up barriers, the majority of people in Scotland know we are better off together with a successful future built on sharing prosperity."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel