THE Musicians Union has urged one of Scotland’s leading festivals to address its “disappointing” lack of gender balance, after revealing a line-up which is more than 80% male.
The 2019 mostly male line-up comes despite promises made last year by organisers DF Concerts that they were “committed to doing better”.
READ MORE: RunEqual campaign calls on UK athletics to follow Scotland’s lead on equality
TRNSMT, taking place on Glasgow Green this July for the third year, announced its line-up last Monday with big name acts including Stormzy, Catfish and the Bottlemen, George Ezra and Gerry Cinnamon.
But out of 46 acts announced on both the main and King Tut stages over the three-day festival, which runs from July 12-14, only six – Jess Glynne, Sigrid, Mabel, Jade Bird, Mahalia and Catherine McGrath – are female solo acts, none of whom is headlining.
There is just one female only band – The Big Moon – while two bands performing – Whenyoung and Skinny Lister – include one woman a-piece.
The others are all-male outfits taking the proportion of either all-male or male dominated acts to 85%. DF Concerts faced backlash on social media as a result.
The Musicians Union (MU) which has been campaigning on the issue, said this year’s gender balance was “disappointing” and urged organisers DF Concerts to join UK festivals who have pledged to work towards 50/50 gender balanced bills by 2022.
READ MORE: David Tennant to speak at march for gender equality
Last year 45, including Celtic Connections, Sonica Festival, XpoNorth and the BBC Proms, signed up to the commitment to gender equality, which was drawn up by Keychange and the PRS Foundation.
The pledge aims to create a “better, more inclusive music industry for present and future generations”. It is supported by Scottish Garbage star Shirley Manson, who recently called the music industry’s lack of equality “insane”.
In 2017 a BBC survey found 80% of festival headliners across the UK were male.
Caroline Sewell, Scottish organiser for the Musicians Union, said: “It is disappointing to see such a male dominated line up [at TRNSMT], particularly at a point in time where the industry is trying to raise awareness and tackle the problem of the lack of female representation on line ups like this.”
Many promoters and organisers say the lack of gender balance reflects market realities, insisting that they have tried to book women, but found they are unavailable because there are not enough successful touring musicians.
Sewell said MU did acknowledge that there are less established female artists and bands than there are male – but insisted line-ups could still be improved.
“The MU fully supports projects such as PRS for Music Foundation’s Keychange initiative, which seeks to empower women by aiming for a 50/50 gender balance on festival billings by 2022,” she added.
“While this may seem aspirational, given where we currently are, we really hope that TRNSMT and other festivals will get on board for the sake of a better, more representative industry and for the benefit of audiences who are more than ready for more interesting and diverse line ups.”
Emma Ritch, executive director of feminist organisation Engender, said audiences deserved better. She added: “Decades after Kathleen Hanna [American singer and riot grrrl] called ‘girls to the front’ we still see a massive over-representation of men in the music industry, whether as artists, managers, or promoters. But even with that over-representation the TRNSMT line-up is still staggeringly male and stale. They and other Scottish festivals need to do more to meet the demand for gender diversity on stage. Girls and women deserve to see more of themselves in these totemic Scottish events.”
Last year TRNSMT boss Geoff Ellis admitted in an interview that there was “a long way to go” with gender balance across festival line-ups but claimed he was “committed to doing more”.
Last week he told music magazine NME that he would “prefer to have more female artists on the bill” but work was needed to develop them into headliners.
But DF did not respond to the Sunday National’s request for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel