This Time with Alan Partridge BBC1, last night ****
ON being asked by an interviewer if he was ever tempted to stray during his marriage, Paul Newman famously inquired why he should go out for hamburger when he had steak at home.
In the same vein, is there a place for a new Alan Partridge series in a world where Richard Madeley and Piers Morgan exist?
The answer came with the first giggle raised by This Time with Alan Partridge, and for half an hour the yucks kept coming, like zombie apes queuing up to play monkey tennis. If we must have one borderline bonkers television presenter with an ego visible from space then it has to be the original and best. Sorry, Piers. Suck it up, Ricardo.
Marianne Taylor: BBC better off without Neil
When we meet Alan again he is filling in for a poorly colleague on a programme not a million miles from The One Show. His co-presenter, Jennie (Susannah Fielding, ace), steals his jokes and rolls her eyes at every opportunity, and there were lots. “I’m a married woman,” said Jennie as he flirted with her, live on air. “I was told you were separated,” was Alan’s attempt at a witty rejoinder.
There were some sharp jabs at the fly-by-the-seat-of-your-pants live television, with a mistake corrected by a tweet which was subsequently amended by an email. Mostly, though, the focus was Alan. His twitching. His chinos. His tie pin. The man is an emotional grenade.
Book review: Limmy at his best
Some things did not work. The set was too big, though this did lend itself to a Spinal Tap-style walk by Alan in the world’s noisiest shoes. But for the most part, Coogan, plus fellow writers Neil and Rob Gibbons, were on top form. Sidekick Simon was back with a “digiwall” that he could not operate; Alan was heckled in traditional fashion while out filming (“Partridge, you w*****!”); his assistant Lynn hates Jennie. It is going to end in tears, but of the good kind.
“Do you think Paul McCartney is watching this?” Alan, needy as a newborn, asked Lynn. If he isn’t, he’s a mug.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here