A MAN has been arrested following a shooting which left three people dead and five more injured on a tram in the Dutch city of Utrecht.
Police have arrested Turkish-born Gökmen Tanis, 37, in connection with the shooting in Holland's fourth largest city.
Authorities initially said it could have been a terror attack, but later it a police spokesman said it might have been a domestic dispute as confusion over motives reigned.
Meanwhile three of the wounded were said to be "fighting for their lives" in hospital.
The man was detained on a street in the north of the city several hours after the shooting, which happened at 10.45am local time on the central 24 Oktoberplein junction.
"We have just been informed that the suspect has been arrested," police chief Rob van Bree said.
Utrecht spent much of the day in lockdown after the incident, with authorities asking residents to stay at home.
Schools were closed and security was increased while counter-terrorism police worked to locate the suspect earlier on Monday.
A few hours after the shooting, Utrecht police released a photo of Tanis said he was "associated with the incident and warned people against approaching him.
Utrecht Mayor Jan van Zanen said: "We cannot exclude, even stronger, we assume a terror motive. [It is] likely there is one attacker, but there could be more."
Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said that "a terror motive is not excluded" and that the attack was met throughout the country with "a mix of disbelief and disgust".
He said the nation had been "jolted by an attack", which he described as "deeply disturbing".
"If it is a terror attack, then we have only one answer: Our nation, democracy, must be stronger that fanaticism and violence," he added.
But a police spokesman, Bernhard Jens, said the attack could be a family dispute and Turkey’s state-run Anadolu news agency, citing relatives of the Turkish-born suspect’s family, said Tanis had fired at a woman for “family reasons” then shot at others who tried to help her.
One witness told local media that "a man started shooting wildly".
Another witness told Dutch public broadcaster NOS that he had helped an injured woman after the tram came to a stop.
"I looked behind me and saw someone lying there behind the tram," he said. "People got out of their cars... and they started to lift her up.
"I helped to pull her out and then I saw a gunman run towards us, with his gun raised," he said.
Another witness Daan Molenaar said he did not believe it was a terrorist attack: “The first thing I thought was, this is some kind of revenge or something, or somebody who’s really mad and grabbed a pistol.”
The national terrorism coordinator, Pieter-Jaap Aalbersberg, raised the alert level in the province to its maximum. Security was also increased in the nearby cities of Amsterdam, Rotterdam and The Hague as well as at Schiphol airport.
READ MORE: Utrecht shooting: Multiple injuries after 'shots fired on tram'
A number of raids were reportedly carried out and counter-terrorism officers were pictured surrounding a building near the 24 Oktoberplein junction, where the tram attack took place.
The shooting took place at a busy junction in a residential area. Police erected a white tent over an area where a body appeared to be lying next to the tram.
Anti-terror officers gathered in front of a block of flats close to the scene. A dog wearing a vest with a camera mounted on it was also seen outside the building.
A police spokesman said one person might have fled by car and he did not rule out the possibility that more than one assailant was involved.
Authorities later reduced the threat level in Utrecht back to four out of five following the arrest, back in line with the rest of the Netherlands.
Political parties halted campaigning ahead of provincial elections scheduled for Wednesday that will also determine the make-up of Parliament's upper house.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel