Theresa May’s request for an extension to Brexit – and her blaming of MPs for not helping her implement the referendum result – makes headlines in Thursday’s papers.
The Prime Minister made a direct appeal to the public on Wednesday evening, telling the UK that she was “on their side”.
READ MORE: Brexit: What Theresa May said in her Downing St statement
She has written to European Council president Donald Tusk formally requesting an extension of Brexit until June 30 ahead of travelling to Brussels for more discussions.
The word “blame” features on a number of the fronts, with the i referring to the “Brexit blame game”, while the Guardian carries the headline “May: don’t blame me for Brexit crisis, blame MPs”.
The paper says Mrs May is facing a “furious backlash” after her statement in Downing Street, with MPs suggesting she should step down.
Comments from the Prime Minister also lead the Times, with the paper suggesting Mrs May is trying to turn voters’ anger at MPs.
Inside the paper, political sketch writer Quentin Letts draws a parallel between Mrs May’s speech and Brenda from Bristol who was catapulted into public consciousness when she reacted to the 2017 snap election by saying “Not another one!”
The leader column, headlined “National Humiliation”, concludes the only way for Tories to secure Brexit is to back the PM’s deal.
It said: “In reality, the choice facing MPs is no choice at all.
“There is little to like about Mrs May’s deal, which even if grudgingly passed will not resolve the national trauma but will merely set the stage for further battles.
“But a no-deal crash-out in eight days’ time for which the country is manifestly ill prepared would destroy what little faith remains in our political system. It is time for the opposition to stop chasing phantoms.”
The Daily Mirror says Mrs May is the victim of “deluded defiance”, accusing her of blaming everyone except herself, while the Sun portrays the PM as Wolfie Smith, the Robert Lindsay character from sitcom Citizen Smith, next to the headline “Power to the people”.
The paper’s leader column strikes a similar tone to the one in the Times, suggesting Mrs May’s deal was the only one on the table.
READ MORE: Theresa May seeks short Brexit delay amid Tory tensions
“The Sun will not pretend her deal is great. It is just the only one available,” the paper says.
“It gets Brexit done, as promised. And it does have merit for Leavers, whatever Tory backbenchers protest.
“Defeat it again and the Government could fall in a no-confidence vote.”
Nick Timothy, former joint chief of staff in 10 Downing Street, writes in the Daily Telegraph that there “wasn’t a better deal on the table”.
He says: “Ever since Gina Miller defeated the Government in the Supreme Court, insisting that Parliament must legislate to invoke Article 50, and through the sorry saga of Grieve amendments, meaningful votes, and Cooper, Boles and Benn amendments, MPs could have taken control with each Brexit vote.
“They could have voted for the PM’s deal, but they rejected it, twice. They could have voted for no deal, but they rejected that, twice. They could have voted for a second referendum, but they refused. They could have voted for a softer Brexit, meaning a customs union, a Norway-style relationship, or a combination of the two. But they refused to do that too.
“The Prime Minister is often accused of kicking the can down the road, but she is not alone: that is all MPs can agree to do.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel