Jeremy Corbyn has declined to rule out halting Brexit if it is the only way of avoiding a no-deal withdrawal from the European Union.
Asked twice whether he is ready to consider revoking the Article 50 letter informing Brussels of the UK’s intention to quit the EU, the Labour leader dismissed the question as “hypothetical” – but did not take the option off the table.
READ MORE: Article 50 petition: More than one million back calls to stop Brexit
He was speaking after talks in Brussels alongside shadow Brexit secretary Sir Keir Starmer with EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier and European Commission secretary general Martin Selmayr.
Describing the discussions as “very constructive”, Mr Corbyn said: “Our determination is to prevent a no-deal exit from the European Union next Friday.
“We are therefore looking for alternatives and building a majority in Parliament that can agree on a future constructive economic relationship with the European Union.
“We’ve been discussing how this could come about and trying to reach out here as both Keir and myself have been reaching out to colleagues in all parties in the UK Parliament.
“This morning’s meetings have been positive and we have done what I believe the Government ought to be doing – instead of bringing back a twice-rejected deal to the British Parliament, looking for constructive solutions.”
READ MORE: Jeremy Corbyn is branded 'petty' after he walks out of No 10 cross-party talks with PM
Asked whether he would consider unilateral revocation of Article 50 if it is the only way to avoid a no-deal Brexit, Mr Corbyn said: “These are hypotheticals. So far as we’re concerned, we think there’s an urgency in constructing a majority for an agreeable solution and that’s what we’re concentrating on at the moment.”
Asked a second time whether he is ruling out revocation, he replied: “We think that what we’re proposing can be achieved in the British Parliament, we do believe we can construct a majority which will prevent the crashing out and all the chaos that will come from crashing out, and that is what we are absolutely focused on.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel