A passenger lounge at London Southend Airport has been ranked the worst out of 21 pay-as-you-go facilities in the UK.
Which? inspectors found the Essex airport’s Skylife Lounge had no hot food, no runway view and no sparkling wine, earning the facility just one star out of five.
Reviews described the lounge as having “stained carpets” which were “dusted with crumbs”, while the food offering was a “sad-looking buffet” of “unripe bananas” and “pastries cut into halves”.
Access to the lounge costs nearly £20 when booked in advance or £24 for those paying on the day.
The airport’s website claims the lounge is “smart and sophisticated”, urging passengers to “start your journey in real style”.
Edinburgh’s Aspire lounge received the second worst score with just one-and-a-half stars.
Although the facility did include a hot food menu, an inspector described a salad as having “a past-its-best tang” while a pasta dish “looked like cat food”.
Joint third worst were London Luton’s Aspire – which offered “congealed eggs” and “stale bread rolls” – alongside Belfast International Causeway and London Heathrow Terminal 5 Aspire.
Complimentary sparkling wines and a la carte dishes helped London Heathrow Terminal 3 No 1 lounge share first place.
It was described by inspectors as the best-equipped facility, boasting a cinema, free showers, private sleep pods and hot food options made to order.
Also sharing the top spot were the Manchester Terminal 3 1903 and London Heathrow Terminal 4 The House lounges.
Which? Travel editor Rory Boland said: “Battling through security queues and the maze that has become duty-free can be such an ordeal – it’s no wonder that the promise of an oasis of calm in a pay-to-enter lounge is so appealing.
“But with lounges charging up to £50 for what might amount to little more than a seat on a stained sofa and a soggy pastry, passengers might be better off saving their cash to treat themselves once they reach their destination.”
Which? reviewed 21 pay-as-you-go lounges at nine UK airports between September and December 2018.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel