The BBC’s Sunday Politics breached broadcasting rules with misleading claims made by presenter Andrew Neil, a watchdog has found.
The host claimed during an interview with former Scottish National Party leader Alex Salmond that “after a decade of SNP rule, one in five Scots pupils leave primary school functionally illiterate”.
READ MORE: Watch: Andrew Neil rapped by BBC over illiteracy in Scotland claim in Salmond grilling
Media watchdog Ofcom has found that his statistical claim was not accurate or based on any official source.
Following a complaint about the false statistic, an investigation found that the claim misled viewers during the build-up to elections in 2017.
Neil said his claim was “all too credible, even if not exactly accurate, as I now realise”.
It was also found that the BBC attempted to find a source to back up Neil’s inaccurate claim, before conceding it was inaccurate and had no basis.
Ofcom is “greatly concerned” with the BBC’s handling of the complaint, and the time taken to admit the error.
A spokeswoman for Ofcom said: “We expect the BBC to take careful note of its errors in the handling of this case to ensure they don’t recur.
“The length of time it took the BBC to admit there was no factual source to support the statement made in this programme was deeply unsatisfactory.
READ MORE: Kezia Dugdale quitting politics for post at Glasgow University
“We expect better standards from the BBC, both in its handling of viewer complaints and in its interactions with Ofcom.”
Neil conducted an interview with former Scottish first minister Salmond in 2017, ahead of the local elections in Scotland and a UK general election.
He asked the politician: “If services have been so well protected, why, after a decade of SNP rule, do one in five Scots pupils leave primary school functionally illiterate?”
Neil then repeated: “Why are one in five functionally illiterate?”
This, Ofcom has ruled, gave a “false impression that Mr Neil’s question was founded on an established fact or source”.
The BBC’s subsequent handling of the complaint has also been criticised by Ofcom.
The watchdog found that not only was the claim unfounded, but that the BBC has erroneously pointed to sources to try and give it some factual basis, and offered “conflicting explanations on the source from which Mr Neil’s statement was derived”.
The BBC also pointed to the fact that First Minister Nicola Sturgeon did not rebut the statistic in a Scottish parliamentary debate as backing their case that it was not materially misleading.
Ofcom’s findings stated that: “The BBC now accepts that it was not based on any such source and that it was therefore not accurate.”
READ MORE: BBC Question Time faces fresh row over claims it edited SNP retort to former UKIP candidate
The watchdog has said that it is concerned that the misleading claims were made during a sensitive election period.
Neil said in his representations to Ofcom: “Questions can always be better framed in retrospect. But I refute Ofcom’s draft conclusion that my question seriously misled viewers about literacy problems.”
He added: “Evidence is strong that illiteracy in Scottish schools is still deeply embedded in the system and that, far from improving, is likely getting worse, even after 10 years of SNP government.”
The BBC has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel