Theresa May has been warned she faces another defeat over her Brexit deal after promising to bring the legislation to write it into law before the Commons in the first week of June.
The Government confirmed it will bring forward the Withdrawal Agreement Bill (WAB), after Mrs May and Jeremy Corbyn held fresh talks on Tuesday evening.
READ MORE: Theresa May to introduce Brexit Bill in first week of June
But the two leaders have failed so far to agree a Brexit package and Mrs May also faces opposition from her DUP allies unless the deal’s Northern Ireland backstop measures are scrapped.
Former Brexit minister Steve Baker questioned the Prime Minister’s decision to bring the legislation for her “failed deal” before Parliament and suggested it would do little to counter the threat posed by Nigel Farage’s Brexit Party.
He said: “If the Brexit Party were demanding we pass this Withdrawal Agreement, a vote might just make sense.
“But they aren’t. Quite the reverse.
“And driving it through over the heads of the DUP appears to eradicate the Government’s majority.”
Mr Baker, deputy chairman of the European Research Group of Brexit-backing Tories, added: “What is Government thinking?”
Labour will oppose the WAB unless a cross-party deal is reached with the Government.
READ MORE: Brexit: Record number of EU nationals working in UK
And DUP Westminster leader Nigel Dodds questioned “what has changed” from the deal which has already been rejected three times by MPs.
“Unless she can demonstrate something new that addresses the problem of the backstop then it is highly likely her deal will go down to defeat once again,” he said.
But International Trade Secretary Liam Fox warned Eurosceptics that they risked the prospect of Brexit never happening if they failed to back the legislation.
Failing to support the WAB would mean either a no-deal Brexit or the revocation of Article 50, cancelling the whole process, he said.
“There will be an opportunity for MPs to decide, after local and European elections, whether they want to vote for Brexit or not,” he told the Institute for Government in London.
“I think MPs will need to look and see whether they want to continue down a path that, inexorably I think, takes us to either the potential of revocation of Article 50 or leaving without a deal, and ask if that’s the best course, either democratically or economically.”
In their Tuesday night meeting, Mrs May was said to have made clear to the Labour leader that she wanted to bring cross-party discussions to a conclusion and “deliver on the referendum result”.
The pair will face each other again on Wednesday during Prime Minister’s Questions in the Commons at noon.
A Downing Street spokesman said the talks between the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition were “useful and constructive”.
Officials from both parties were continuing the efforts to reach an agreement on Wednesday and the Prime Minister’s Brexit negotiator Olly Robbins was in Brussels for a second day of talks about the potential to make changes to the Political Declaration setting out the future UK-EU relationship.
READ MORE: Brexit Party overtakes Tories in new general election poll
Labour said Mr Corbyn set out the shadow Cabinet’s concerns about the Prime Minister’s ability to deliver on any compromise agreement during his talks with Mrs May, given the uncertainty about her leadership.
It is understood that Mr Corbyn rejected any suggestion that Labour would support the Withdrawal Agreement Bill without agreement.
With Mrs May’s future linked to the passage of a Brexit deal, getting legislation through the Commons and Lords by the summer break could also pave the way for her departure from Number 10.
She is due to meet senior Tory MPs on the backbench 1922 Committee’s executive on Thursday for talks about her future.
The Withdrawal Agreement will go before the Commons in the same week US President Donald Trump is due to make a state visit to the UK.
Mr Trump and his wife Melania will be in the UK from Monday June 3 to Wednesday June 5.
On Thursday June 6, a by-election will be held in Peterborough to find a replacement for MP Fiona Onasanya, who lost her seat through a recall petition after serving time in prison for lying about a speeding offence.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel