RESIDENTS blighted by air pollution and noise from a petrochemical plant are set for payouts from an oil giant after councillors backed a motion seeking compensation.
In a debate in Fife Council on the future of the Fife Ethylene Plant at Mossmorran, run by ExxonMobil, councillors from all parties condemned the six-day spate of unplanned flaring at the chemical works, beginning on Easter Sunday.
Read more: Oil giants under fire for safety failings at Fife plant
The incident triggered a record number of complaints to the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) as local people raised the alarm over huge plumes of black smoke, chemical-smelling fumes and a rumbling noise emanating from the site.
ExxonMobil has insisted the flare posed no danger to the public and blamed the problem on a faulty section of cable.
The firm had already been served with final warning letters in 2018 over a previous flaring incident in 2017, and campaigners said neighbouring communities have been left fearing that the ageing plant will blow, as well as what impact the noise and pollution could be having on their health.
Read more: Investigation launched into unplanned flaring at Mossmorran power plant
Today councillors voted by a majority of 32 to 23 in favour of a motion calling for “appropriate and substantial compensation from the companies to individuals and communities affected by flaring incidents”.
It also said it would seek “discussions with the Scottish and UK Governments, the companies and trade unions regarding the long term future of the plant and a possible strategy for its decommissioning”, as well as requesting that the Scottish Government “commission an independent expert study of the environmental, social and health impacts on the surrounding communities” of Mosmorran.
James Glen, of the Mossmorran Action Group, set up two years ago in response to growing local alarm at the increasing incidence of emergency flaring and its impact on local residents, said support for the motion marked a “historic turning pointing” against the ageing plant.
Read more: 'Unacceptable' flaring at power plant ceases after six days
Mr Glen said: “For first time, councillor after councillor stood up to validate the experience of residents around Mossmorran, who have been forced to put up with the adverse impacts of the plant’s operations for 34 years.”
Conservative councillor Linda Holt said: “The original motion for an independent study was put forward by local Conservative councillor Darren Watt in response to a deluge of complaints and rising public anxiety about the safety of the plant.
“You could see the recent flare from Dundee to Edinburgh and hear it across Fife, while locals reported sleeplessness, breathing difficulties and headaches, and not just children were terrified that the plant was going to blow. The council was unanimous in standing with the residents in feeling that enough was enough.”
The Scottish Greens have already called for the Mosmorran plant to be closed down.
Speaking at the Scottish Parliament on Wednesday, Fife MSP Mark Ruskell said there was “no sign from Mossmorran’s owners that they are prepared to invest to give the plant a future”. He added lessons should be learned, however, from the the closure of Longannet power station, where 230 direct jobs were wiped out.
Stuart Neill, external affairs manager at ExxonMobil Fife Ethylene Plant, said the firm had already shared with Mr Ruskell its plans for a “multi-million-pound investment programme that will work to further minimise the frequency and impact of unplanned flaring”, in addition to a £100 million investment in maintenance and modernisation in the past five years.
The Scottish Government said it does not have the power to close Mossmorran.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here