A PRO-INDEPENDENCE blogger has hit out at the "incomprehensible" costs awarded to former Scottish Labour leader Kezia Dugdale in a failed defamation case.

The Wings over Scotland blogger Stuart Campbell said he now faces a bill of some £100,000 - but that heis considering an appeal against the defamation verdict which, if successful, would automatically quash the expenses liability.

In April, Mr Campbell lost a a £25,000 defamation case against Ms Dugdale after she accused him of making homophobic remarks, despite a judge ruling her comments were incorrect.

Now Mr Campbell, who lives in Bath in Somerset, has expressed dismay after a sheriff awarded Ms Dugdale full costs, plus 50 per cent.

It will fall to Mr Campbell, as the losing party, to cover these.

Writing in his blog tonight Mr Campbell said he expects the cost "to be in the rough vicinity of £100,000". 

Ms Dugdale's legal bills had originally been covered by the Labour Party, but it pulled the plug in September 2018 - before the case had even reached a full hearing.

The Daily Record subsequently stepped in to fund the case, as the row stemmed from Ms Dugdale's column with the newspaper.   

READ MORE: 'Wings over Scotland case left me heartbroken'

Mr Campbell wrote: "We've just received the verdict in the hearing over costs in our court case against Kezia Dugdale, and it's an incomprehensible one.

"The sheriff has awarded costs in full to Dugdale, plus a 50% 'uplift' mainly on the grounds of 'complexity' of the case, despite Dugdale having employed the services of perhaps Scotland's highest-paid specialist defamation QC."

Ms Dugdale was represented by Roddy Dunlop QC, while Mr Campbell was represented by Craig Sandison QC.

Ms Dugdale said she did not want to comment on the decision, except to thank the Daily Record "for standing by me". 

She added that she was "delighted that's rewarded with them getting all their money back". 

READ MORE: Wings over Scotland blogger 'horrified' by homophobic claim

Mr Campbell insisted that the case was "in fact a quite straightforward one" in terms of defamation law, and that the Sheriff had given "no explanation" of the complexities involved.  

Mr Campbell said an "overwhelming majority" of the Wings over Scotland readers who had responded to a poll were in favour of him appealing against the defamation verdict. 

The Wings over Scotland blog is paid for through crowdfunding, raising more than £150,000 annually.

The three-day hearing at Edinburgh Sheriff Court in March resulted in a ruling by Sheriff Nigel Ross in April that while Ms Dugdale had been incorrect to imply Mr Campbell was a homophobe in her Daily Record column, the article was covered by the defence of fair comment.

As a result, Mr Campbell's claim for damages was thrown out.

The verdict states that Ms Dugdale is entitled to full costs plus an additional 50% according to laws outlining the fee provisions for solicitors, which cover various factors. 

These include the "complexity of the cause, and the number, difficulty or novelty of the question raised"; the "skill, time, and labour, and specialised knowledge required, of the solicitor"; and "the importance of the cause or the subject-matter of it to the client".

The defamation row centred on a tweet Mr Campbell, 51, sent in March 2017.

He wrote that the Scottish Secretary David Mundell’s son, the Tory MSP Oliver Mundell, was “the sort of public speaker that makes you wish his dad had embraced his homosexuality sooner".

READ MORE: Wings over Scotland judgement reveals all you need to know about where Scottish politics goes next 

David Mundell came out as gay in 2016 and has described it as “one of the most difficult things” he has ever done.

Writing in her Daily Record column a few days later, Ms Dugdale said she was “shocked and appalled to see a pro-independence blogger's homophobic tweets”, and accused Wings Over Scotland of spouting "hatred and homophobia towards others".

Mr Campbell denied he is homophobic and insisted her comments were defamatory.