Scottish Secretary Alister Jack has said the UK Government’s proposed £30,000 salary threshold for EU migrants is too high and should be lowered.
The figure, set out in the Government’s White Paper on immigration published in December, would mean EU workers would have to earn a minimum salary of £30,000 when entering the UK.
It is the same threshold currently set for non-EU citizens working in Britain.
However, concerns have been raised over the threshold being set well above the average salary in different parts of the UK – including in Scotland where it is around £24,000.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson to chair first Brexit strategy meeting as no deal plans get £2bn boost
Speaking to ITV News, Mr Jack said he would urge Home Secretary Priti Patel to agree to lower the threshold.
“I am feeding into the review and my belief is that £30,000 is too high. It might work in London but it doesn’t work outside London,” said Mr Jack.
“And it’s not just farming, it’s not just the seasonal workers scheme which I think we should increase, it also affects the NHS, it affects construction, it affects care workers and lots of other sectors.
“I don’t think a solution that’s done by geography or by sector is right because you’ll always forget an area or you’ll forget a sector.
“I think we need to do a financial figure, but it’s got to be a lot less than £30,000.”
The Scottish Government has previously voiced its support for Scotland to have a separate immigration system to that of the UK in order to better meet workforce needs in the country.
READ MORE: Letters: Be grateful we have a leader of vision
In June, the Scottish Conservatives also called for a more flexible approach to be taken in order to recognise the needs of Scotland’s economy after the UK leaves the European Union.
They said UK immigration policy must recognise sectors such as farming, fish processing, hospitality and social care heavily rely on foreign labour.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel