A lawyer representing the family of the man charged in the El Paso shooting rampage says the man's mother contacted police weeks before the rampage out of concern that her son had a rifle.
Twenty-two people died and dozens were injured after a white gunman targeting a Hispanic area opened fire at a Walmart in the border city Saturday.
The incident is being treated as terrorism and has sparked protests against US President Donald Trump, who, his critics say, uses racist language which incites anti-immigration extremism.
Dallas attorney Chris Ayres confirmed to the Associated Press that the call was made to police in the suspected shooter’s town of Allen, Texas, a Dallas suburb.
Mr Ayres and fellow attorney R. Jack Ayres told CNN that the shooter’s mother contacted the Allen Police Department to ask about an "AK"-type firearm he owned.
The attorneys said the mother was only seeking information and wasn't motivated by a concern that her son was a threat to anybody. They also said the mother didn't identify herself or her son in the call.
The lawyers told CNN the mother was concerned about her son's age, maturity level and lack of experience but was told by a public safety officer that her son, who is 21, was legally allowed to possess the weapon.
The lawyers didn't dispute the information given to other media sources when contacted by USA Today, The Herald's America sister paper/
A family statement sent by Chris Ayres to USA Today said the suspected shooter acted outside the family's teachings and values.
"He was raised in a family that taught love, kindness, respect, and tolerance – rejecting all forms of racism, prejudice, hatred, and violence," the statement says. "There will never be a moment for the rest of our lives when we will forget each and every victim of this senseless tragedy."
Sgt. Jon Felty, Allen police spokesman, said he couldn't confirm the call.
"I have nothing in the database to support this claim," he told USA TODAY on Thursday.
This story first appeared in USA Today
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel