Tour operator Thomas Cook has confirmed that it needs £200m to avoid the possibility of going bust.
Were the company to go under, an estimated 180,000 people could be stranded abroad, while the firm employs 22,000 staff around the world.
The company is seeking the extra funding as it attempts to prevent a collapse and is in talks with leading shareholder Chinese firm Fosun, to bridge the funding gap.
Up to 9,000 UK jobs could be at risk and if Thomas Cook goes into administration, the government could have to pay to fly British holidaymakers back home.
It would become the 'Britain's biggest peacetime repatriation'.
Brian Strutton, general secretary of pilots' union Balpa, said: "This puts 9,000 good quality UK jobs needlessly at risk and puts an iconic British brand in jeopardy.
"The Government has a say in this, owning one of the key banks and still with huge influence over the other. RBS and Lloyds should be told by the Prime Minister to support Thomas Cook.
"If Thomas Cook goes into administration it will cost the taxpayer as much to repatriate holidaymakers as it would cost to save Thomas Cook.
"The Government sat on the sidelines wringing its hands when Monarch Airlines was let down by its financiers. This time Government needs to get a grip and do its bit to save Thomas Cook."
Thomas Cook said the £200 million needed would be a "seasonal standby facility", on top of £900 million it had already raised from Fosun and its lenders.
The travel firm has suffered recently as a result of mounting debts, reporting a £1.2 billion net debt in its half-year results in May.
It has also been hit hard by an influx of online competitors which has resulted in oversupply, forcing tour operators to cut prices.
The 178-year-old firm could go bust by Sunday, company insiders have allegedly told the Daily Mail.
The paper also said that government officials have drawn up plans for what would be "Britain's biggest peacetime repatriation".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article