THE SCOTTISH Police Authority has been condemned for a "damning culture of failure", according to a governance report, it has been claimed.
HM Inspectorate of Constabulary in Scotland (HMICS) found the chairwoman and a number of board members at SPA are acting "well outwith their core non-executive roles", contrary to their agreed job descriptions and guidelines.
The report also noted there is "no clear vision, strategy or plan in place" for the SPA, which has resulted in a lack of wider understanding of the steps required to achieve its aims.
HMICS went on to state "limited progress" had been made in tackling structural issues and a "conflict of interest" is caused by the SPA being both a service provider to and scrutiny body of Police Scotland.
Scottish Liberal Democrats justice spokesman Liam McArthur, said the report highlighted a need for a new corporate structure at the SPA, as well as a review of the roles of the chair and board members.
READ MORE: Scottish Police Authority in new transparency row over chief executive Hugh Grover's absence
"Scottish Liberal Democrats have warned for years that the structure of the national force embedded too much power and authority in a small number of hands," he said.
"This report clearly demonstrates that the structures managing the scrutiny of one of our most pivotal public services are ambiguous at best.
"Robust accountability of the police cannot be dependent on the whim of those who have a seat at the table."
He added: "It is this centralisation of power which has contributed to the damning culture of failure outlined in this report.
"This is not good enough for officers, staff or the public they serve.
"This report is clear that we need a new corporate structure and a review of the roles of the chair and board members.
"The Scottish Government and SPA must now lay out a timetable for this to take place.
SPA chairwoman Susan Deacon said: "The SPA board is actively taking forward a range of work to progress improvements in the leadership and governance of policing, much of which is actively addressing issues identified in the HMICS report.
"We are committed to continuing to work closely with a range of partners including the Scottish Government to accelerate the pace of change and improvement and to ensure that the authority is able to carry out its functions effectively as envisaged in the legislation."
READ MORE: 'Mind-boggling' £8m Police Scotland spend on Brexit
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "Ministers are grateful to the Chief Inspector for this report which recognises the positive impact of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA) members in improving the effectiveness of the SPA.
"The majority of the recommendations are for the SPA to take forward and we will consider the Scottish Government's role in delivery, including providing ongoing support to the Authority.
"We have agreed with the SPA that an early action will be to jointly review the SPA's Governance and Accountability Framework, to ensure that it clearly sets out the role and expectations of the SPA Board in the context of its founding legislation, particularly in relation to its scrutiny of the national police service.
"We will clarify the practical implications of this for Board members, ensuring external assurance as appropriate."
The Scottish Liberal Democrats last week described as "mind-boggling" the £8m Police Scotland Brexit preparation spend.
According to a report tothe Scottish Police Authority board, £8,053,218 had been spent by the force up to September 9 on Brexit planning.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel