Thursday's opinion page pieces concentrated on the fallout over inflammatory language used in Parliament in a fiery debate after the Supreme Court found Boris Johnson's suspension of House of Commons proceedings was "unlawful". Here is The Herald’s pick of those editorials.
The Scotsman.
It's leader talked of "shameful scenes in a toxic parliament" and said it was now the responsibility of all sides to "lower the temperature and attempt respectful debate".
"The Prime Minister suggesting that the best way to honour the murdered Labour politician Jo Cox - who campaigned to Remain in the EU - was to 'get Brexit done', was simply indefensible. Even for him," said the paper.
"The use of inflammatory language in the Chamber in general was appalling. And the fact that this all played out on live TV in the 'Mother of all Parliaments' was perhaps the most troubling of all.
Words matter, and all politicians of course know this."
It added: "We know the desperate divisions created by Brexit have resulted in an unacceptable rise in hate speech and an apparent tolerance for it. It is the responsibility of all sides to ensure temperatures are lowered and some semblance of reasoned and respectful debate can take place.
"There was no apology from the Prime Minister yesterday - no surprise."
The Daily Telegraph
The paper pointed the finger of accusation at the House of Commons Speaker, John Bercow, who was "happy to preside over a raucous, ranting rabble some of whom accused the Prime Minister of being a bigot and a racist, accusations that today are somewhat more toxic and inflammatory than 'hooligan' or 'squirt'".
The leader said: "But should we be surprised given the circumstances that tempers boiled over in the Commons? After all, what is the chamber for, if not to air the grievances of the nation and reflect the divisions that already exist? Nor has it always been a paragon of propriety."
"Mr Johnson used nothing like the intemperate language directed at him yet finds himself pilloried for allegedly insulting the memory of a murdered MP and playing to the mob.
"A debating chamber is not supposed to be a place where statements are read out in the hope that a tortured soundbite will make it on to the news. What so many MPs denounced as the collapse in standards merely reflected their own inadequacies as debaters."
The Independent
It's leader drew parallels between the Prime Minister and Donald Trump, but believed that Mr Johnson's "divisive language" will unite his opponents.
"The self-Trumpification of Mr Johnson makes Britain ashamed to have him as its leader. He is an embarrassment not because he is a jolly clown but because he is a sinister one, like his model in Washington. That is something of a first," said the paper.
"The prime minister enjoys tight 24/7 security behind a wall of armed police. Not everyone has that assured level of safety.
"Mr Johnson should also acknowledge that there are some crazed individuals out there who respond to such an atmosphere, and who will happily make it their business to attack MPs, judges, party workers or anyone else they perceive as "traitors".
"If only for that reason, Mr Johnson should stop with the insults before it is too late."
The Times
The paper said "extreme rhetoric" on all sides "threatens to discredit parliament" while arguing Mr Johnson's "inflammatory language" makes a Brexit deal less likely.
It said the EU cannot expect to make concessions unless it believes Mr Johnson can get a new deal through Parliament, making the PM's decision to "further polarise the Brexit debate ill judged".
READ MORE: Boris Johnson set to skip 'zombie Parliament' PMQs in favour of Tory conference speech
"Boris Johnson deserves censure for what happened on Wednesday night," the leader stated.
"The Times has been critical in recent weeks of opponents of the prime minister who have used hysterical language to criticise the government's actions. There is no question their inflammatory talk of "coups" and "dictators" and accusations of fascism have contributed to the febrile environment. Now it is Mr Johnson who needs to calm down."
And it added: "The Times backed Mr Johnson to become prime minister not because we were blind to his flaws but because we believed that, despite those flaws, he remained at his core a centre-right Conservative with the charisma and political skills to secure a Brexit deal and defeat a Labour Party captured by the far left. Even after all the mis-steps and setbacks of the past month, there is still time for Mr Johnson to fulfil these expectations. But not much time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel