The hitman serving time for executing gangster Euan Johnston has a new bid to clear his name.
Lawyers acting for David Scott, 33, told the Court of Criminal Appeal in July that they should be allowed to continue working on his cause.
Judges Lord Carloway, Lord Turnbull and Lord Menzies heard the lawyers had identified “fresh” issues from Scott’s trial which show he may have fallen victim to a miscarriage of justice.
Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge, had said the “fresh” evidence identified by the lawyers did not meet strict legal tests to show that Scott was the victim of a miscarriage of justice.
But it has been confirmed that a fresh hearing in an appeal against conviction is scheduled to be heard next week. The case is due to be heard in front of three so-far unidentified judges.
Scott, originally of Glasgow, was handed a life sentence in May 2018 at Glasgow's high court in which he was ordered to serve a minimum of 22 years.
Jurors heard how Scott shot Mr Johnston (above) twice in the head in the attack in Glasgow in November 2016. One bullet went through his brain.
The 26-year-old suffered a catastrophic brain injury and died later in hospital.
Mr Johnston, a father-of-two, was sitting in his Audi RS4 at red lights at the junction of Shields Road and Scotland Street at about 23:40 when he was targeted.
He was chatting to partner Danielle Carruthers on the phone when an Audi Q5 pulled alongside and three shots rang out.
Two of the bullets hit Mr Johnston, who was known as EJ, in the head. One went through his brain.
The third bullet hit the rubber seal round the driver's door of Mr Johnston's car.
Earlier in the trial, which concluded in May, last year, Scott's co-accused, 33-year-old Anthony Ruthven, was cleared of murder.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here