Health boards have been warned they may be breaking the law if they isolate people with mental health problems or learning disabilities – even if they do not lock the door.
New guidance from the Mental Welfare Commission (MWC), defines seclusion as keeping someone in a locked room but also any situation where staff are preventing a person from leaving, whether the door is locked or not.
It says the practice is sometimes necessary, particularly when there is a risk of harm to others.
But, without proper procedures, it can be unlawful, not just in hospitals but even if it takes place in a person’s own home or another community setting.
A Good Practice Guide, published today by the Commission, says that when seclusion takes place it must be for the shortest time possible and the safety, rights and welfare of the person involved must be protected.
READ MORE: ‘Workforce crisis’ warning for Scotland’s mental health services
And it warns: “Some observers believe that no one receiving care for any form of mental illness, learning disability or related conditions should ever be locked in a room on their own.”
Previous guidance has been limited to the seclusion of people in hospital settings, the MWC says, and has focused on situations where the door to a ward or room is locked.
However, the new guidance says this is not the only time the rules should apply.
“Seclusion implies use of a locked door”, it states. “However, where someone prevents a person from leaving a room, by physically blocking the exit, this should still be considered seclusion.”
Despite this, some health boards and community services believe seclusion only relates to the use of a locked room, the MWC says. As a result, some health boards do not have a policy on its use, claiming it does not happen.
Without clear policies, mental health services can break the law without meaning to. A 2017 MWC report said: “Unlawful detention can occur inadvertently – for example ... when an informal patient [who hasn’t been detained under the Mental Health Act] is told that they can’t leave the ward or when a nurse is positioned at a ward exit to discourage informal patients from leaving.”
Alison Thomson, executive director of nursing at the MWC, said: “It is clear from observation and inquiries that seclusion is used in a number of hospitals in Scotland and in other settings.”
In some situations, she added, especially if there is a risk of harm to others, the individual being cared for may agree that some form of seclusion would be beneficial. “But it is critical that care providers clearly understand whether or not they are using seclusion.”
Even if it is with consent, it is vital clear records are kept in all cases, the guidelines state.
Seclusion should never be used to compensate for staff shortages or an “inadequate environment”, the report adds; nor should seclusion ever be used, or its use threatened, as a punishment.
Ms Thomson added: “We also ask all health boards in Scotland to create a policy on the use of seclusion, regardless of whether they say it is used or not.”
This would allow staff to decide for themselves whether an action they are taking qualifies, she said.
Official figures suggest that in recent years there has been a reduction in the use of seclusion for people with mental health issues and learning disabilities.
But health boards should try to cut its use further, the MWC says, and look for less restrictive care arrangements wherever possible, adding: “Failure to do this has the potential to lead to inhuman and degrading treatment of some of the most vulnerable people in our society.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here