An independent Scotland could take its place in the European Union “relatively comfortably and relatively quickly”, according to a leading law professor.
Edinburgh Law School professor Drew Scott said that there had been a change in attitudes in Brussels since the Scottish referendum in 2014.
And he dismissed previous suggestions that Spain could veto EU membership for an independent Scotland because of its stance on Catalonia.
READ MORE: Support for Scottish independence rises to 50%, according to new poll
Speaking at a fringe event on Europe at the SNP conference in Aberdeen, professor Scott said: “The mood in Brussels today is quite different from the mood in Brussels in 2014 before the independence referendum.
“I don’t see this as a political point, it just is a fact of life that there is now a much higher degree of recognition that Scotland is a mainstream European country where 62% voted to remain, and I suspect although it’s not been tested that would now be higher given what people see what the leave options are, that Scotland would take its place relatively quickly, relatively comfortably within the European family of nations and would continue to contribute as it has done.
“We don’t make enough in this country, and I mean Scotland now, of the contributions that we’ve actually added to the European project.”
Professor Scott continued: “I think Scotland could take its place relatively comfortably, relatively quickly providing we’re prepared to accept the obligations of membership and assuming we had achieved independence by a constitutional due process.
READ MORE: Mark Smith: A declaration that can offer an alternative to SNP
“The Spanish shadow is always raised but I think Spain’s position is quite clear, I think it always has been quite clear actually, that if Scotland becomes independent under a constitutional process which is accepted by all parts of the UK and all citizens of the UK, then Spain’s got no particular problem with that because it’s a quite different situation from that which exists within Spain.
“So I don’t see the shadow of a Spanish veto at all lying over this.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel