HOLYROOD is being urged to recommend a moratorium on the use of facial recognition technology - especially by the police.
Academics raised concerns about "deficiencies" in such new technology, and also claimed it was "intrusive".
In submissions to MSPs on the Scottish Parliament's Justice Sub-Committee on Policing, they argued for a moratorium to be put in place.
In its submission, Police Scotland was clear the force has "no current plans to introduce live facial recognition software or any other new biometric technology".
But Dr Angela Daly, from Strathclyde Law School, urged the committee to "become an international leader in ethical technology policy by recommending a moratorium on the use of facial recognition technology in Scotland, especially by police forces".
Daly made the recommendations due to the "deficiencies of facial recognition technology, the intrusive ways in which [it] is already being used to monitor indiscriminately the general public - and not only those suspected of a crime - and the less-than ethical conditions in which facial recognition technology is being researched and developed".
Dr Daly stated: "I urge the committee to consider deeply the impact on the privacy and other human rights of the general public in being subjected to invasive mass-monitoring by facial recognition technology used by police."
Dr Garfield Benjamin from Solent University in Southampton also argued for a moratorium, and said: "This should ideally be permanent, or at least until significant regulatory frameworks have been put in place.
"When a member of the public enters a space monitored by facial recognition, they are automatically placed in a police line-up.
"This fundamentally changes the role and power of the police, from one in which evidence is a case must be built to prove guilt into one in which everyone is assumed guilty all the time.
"Should Police Scotland (or, indeed, any police force) go ahead with the use of facial recognition then they are making an active choice to shift policing into a state of constant surveillance, forcing citizens to live beneath a constant machinic gaze."
Gillian MacDonald, Assistant Chief Constable for Police Scotland said: "Fundamentally, opportunities exist to use new technologies, such as facial recognition, to enhance police and law enforcement capabilities".
She added that the force already has the capability to carry out retrospective facial matching using the Police National Database, but confirmed there were "no current plans" to introduce live software or "other new biometric technology".
Meanwhile sub-committee convener John Finnie said MSPs would "closely study" all the submissions they had received.
He said "While the police service need to be able to fight crime effectively, any intrusion into citizens' privacy must be proportionate. We look forward to beginning our inquiry."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel