WESTMINSTER must lift the so-called 'rape clause' which is creating consequences "no government should be willing to accept".
The Work and Pensions Committee yesterday issued its final report on the two-child benefits policy, which has been widely criticised across the country.
Campaigners argue the legislation, which allows people to claim benefits for their first two children only, disproportionately affects women who may have conceived their third child as a result of rape.
The government said they would be exempt from the policy, only if they declared they had been raped.
Just 510 women had received an exemption in those circumstances, which experts believe to be less than those actually affected.
Now, the Committee has concluded that “no Government should be willing to accept” the consequences of the two-child limit, and demanded that it be lifted.
Rt Hon Frank Field MP, Chair of the Committee, said: “Any family in this country, except the super-rich, could fall foul of the two-child limit if their circumstances changed for the worse.
"This is exactly why social security must act as a national insurance scheme covering people when they’re most exposed to hardship - not increase it.”
Their report stated: "The Government’s justification for providing support through tax credits and Universal Credit to only the first two children in a family is that it wants parents claiming benefits to face the same financial choices as those who are supporting themselves solely through work.
"It argues that this policy is necessary to achieve fairness. That argument may be initially attractive. But it simply does not stand up to scrutiny.
"This distinction is crude and unrealistic: someone supporting themselves through work today might well need help from the benefits system tomorrow.
"By the Government’s logic, only a household wealthy enough to withstand all of life’s misfortunes without recourse to the benefits system could responsibly decide to have more than two children. Such households will be few and far between."
The report also added that "having children is not always a choice" and explained: "Only a minority of third children result from planned pregnancies. Some are conceived as a result of rape or coercive control—and with only 510 survivors receiving the exemption for such cases, it is inevitable that some are being affected by the two-child limit, despite the Government’s stated intentions. The two-child limit wrongly assumes either that pregnancies are always planned or that those who conceive as a result of rape or coercive control are in a position to leave their partner and disclose what has happened."
When the Committee first reported on the two-child limit in January this year the Government immediately accepted its central recommendation and reversed the “inexplicable” retroactive element it had intended to apply to children born before the policy was even conceived.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel