The Duke of York has been dealt a major blow after KPMG, a sponsor of his flagship business project said it was not renewing support.
It emerged the accountancy firm is understood to have made the decision at the end of October as calls continued for him to make a statement about Jeffrey Epstein.
The revelation follows Prince Andrew's appearance on BBC Newsnight in what critics called a "car-crash" interview.
In the interview, the Queen's third child said he still did not regret his friendship with US financier Epstein - who took his own life in August while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges in the US.
READ MORE: Prince Andrew criticised over 'disastrous' Newsnight interview
During the interview, the Duke of York denied sleeping with one of Epstein's victims Virginia Giuffre, who was 17 at the time, saying one encounter in 2001 did not happen as he was in Woking taking his daughter Princess Beatrice to Pizza Express for a party.
Andrew is now facing the embarrassing prospect of charities and institutions he is associated with distancing themselves as lawyers for the convicted sex offender's victims urged him to tell US authorities what he knows.
The Queen and other senior royals are said to "back and believe" Andrew's defence of himself in the BBC interview "100 per cent", sources have told the Evening Standard.
Now it has emerged KPMG's sponsorship contract with Andrew's Pitch@Palace, a mentoring scheme for tech start-ups and entrepreneurs, would not be renewed.
A spokesman for Buckingham Palace said: "KPMG's contract with Pitch@Palace ended at the end of October. A full programme of Pitch@Palace events is continuing across the United Kingdom."
The scheme was founded by the prince in 2014 and involves entrepreneurs competing for the chance to pitch their business ideas to influential business figures.
The project operates in 64 countries and claims to have created more than 6,300 jobs.
The fall-out from Andrew's Newsnight appearance has already begun with the Outward Bound Trust, which the duke supports as patron, saying it will hold a board meeting in the next few days when members will discuss issues raised by Saturday's interview.
Meanwhile the termly student jury at Huddersfield University, where Andrew is chancellor, has voted on a motion to lobby the duke to resign - the result of the ballot will be published in the next few days.
And Jo Swinson led criticism from political leaders over Prince Andrew’s “disheartening” remarks about his friendship with Epstein (above).
The Liberal Democrat leader condemned his use of language about sex and failure to put the late financier’s victims at the centre of his BBC interview.
However, Boris Johnson refused to be drawn when asked whether he shared “the nation’s incredulity” about the royal’s account of his behaviour.
“I think, like most people watching it, I found it a very troubling thing to see,” said Ms Swinson during a campaign visit in St Albans. “And, I just couldn’t quite understand how somebody could be talking about their relationship with that man without recognising, or understanding, or discussing, how he felt about those victims. And I felt they should have been much more at the centre of that discussion.”
She continued: “Those girls and young women who were trafficked, who were sexually abused by Epstein. And how you could have a whole interview discussing that without him expressing his views, his sympathy, his feelings about what those young women had gone through I just thought was really disheartening.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel